“…In China today, nongmin as a formal classification continues to indicate backwardness and low level of “ suzhi ” (literally “human quality,” i.e., the human capital and cultural knowledge necessary to be worthy members of modern China) (Chu, 2010; Hsu, 2006; Zavoretti, 2016). For decades, this discourse has been produced and reinforced by the construction of rural migrants as strangers in the city (Yan, 2003; Zhang, 2001) who are deemed to be occupying the lower rungs of a hierarchical social order underpinned by what Ban (2018) terms “cultural urbanism.” This defines the countryside as the underside of progress and rural people as a homogeneous group (Nguyen, Vo, & Wei, n.d.; Zavoretti, 2016), which is “backward, unsophisticated, homogeneous, conservative, poor, and otherwise lacking in various ways” (Ban, 2018, 11, citing Thompson, 2013, 161). In combination with the social and administrative mechanisms associated with household registration ( hukou ), the discourse helps to hold down the value of migrant labor and the social costs of reproducing it (Jacka, 2018a, b; Lin & Nguyen, 2021), facilitating value extraction from migrant labor for the sake of accumulation in urban centers (Yan, 2003).…”