2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shopping for fun or shopping to buy: Is it different online and offline?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
96
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Babin et al (1994) proposed two experience value dimensions: hedonic and utilitarian. Hedonic value is related to enjoyment and playfulness, reflecting the experiential side of shopping, comprising pleasure and curiosity (Scarpi et al 2014). The main antecedent of hedonic value is the emotional experience (Jackson et al 2011).…”
Section: Value Perception Towards Shopping Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Babin et al (1994) proposed two experience value dimensions: hedonic and utilitarian. Hedonic value is related to enjoyment and playfulness, reflecting the experiential side of shopping, comprising pleasure and curiosity (Scarpi et al 2014). The main antecedent of hedonic value is the emotional experience (Jackson et al 2011).…”
Section: Value Perception Towards Shopping Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chu et al (2010) find that grocery shoppers exhibit significant differences between online and offline shopping behaviors. Furthermore, online and offline shoppers express different content in word of mouth messages (Scarpi, Pizzi, and Visentin 2014). These findings demonstrate that consumers behave differently in those two shopping contexts and that consumers have different motivations for shopping online than for shopping offline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Against this background, focusing on the online world when calculating the CLNV can only provide a limited view and may be insufficient in some cases. Therefore, we see the integrated quantification of both online and offline influence as a very promising topic for future research (Liu et al 2012;Scarpi et al 2014). This seems particularly challenging due to the fact that for the context of OSNs it is much easier to determine and estimate the customer specific parameters of the CLNV in an automated way (Tang and Guo 2015) (e.g., based on messages exchanged electronically and using text mining and sentiment analysis techniques and algorithms).…”
Section: Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 94%