Shopping Streets and Neighborhood Identity: Retail Theming as Symbolic Ownership in New York

Abstract

As the economies of production and trade have dwindled in Western cities, urban locales have had to capitalize on other opportunities for growth. Middle and upper class consumers are now sought after resources for cities and neighborhoods once supported by manufacturing. This article considers the role of local retail actors in shifting neighborhood identity towards luxury consumption. Important in this transformation is the process of theming by which business owners rely on cues from the neighborhood's identity and institutions, incorporate these cues into decisions for their own businesses, and thereby reify or change neighborhood identity. By tracing changes on shopping streets in Williamsburg, Brooklyn and Manhattan's Lower East Side, I show how retail theming interacts with neighborhood identity. Interviews with storeowners and archival retail data illuminate how choices made by entrepreneurs or coporations contribute to dramatic aesthetic changes on the street. As the neighborhood identities change, existing long–term residents and less wealthy visitors become excluded from the local shopping streets and lose ownership over neighborhoods.

Conceptualizing the potential of entrepreneurship to shape urban sustainability transformations

“…External value interventions change the influence entrepreneurs exert on how a city or a neighborhood is perceived and the identity that defines it (Parzer and Huber 2015;Martucci 2019). The underlying ideas and principles that inform urban…”

Waste not, want not: planning for consumer goods reuse in municipal waste management strategies

“…In general, the location of retail is important, and not only for the task of providing necessary provisions, as neighbourhood businesses can provide important social functions for members of the community (Hubbard, 2017;Jacobs, 1961;Zukin et al, 2009as cited in Martucci, 2019. Additionally, according to Ocejo (2014) and Parker (2018), shops are able to convey "an area's character, aesthetic, function, and even demographics to residents, visitors and media" (as cited in Martucci, 2019Martucci, , p. 1123. Retail stores can also impact the development of neighbourhood identity as part of a broader commercial streetscape (Deener, 2007, p. 294).…”

Place Attachment and Alienation from Place: Cultural Displacement in Gentrifying Ethnic Enclaves

“…[defined as] the condition of estrangement between a person and his/her community.” In Marcuse’s model, landlords take the place of employers as the legal owners of dwellings and communities, and renters’ limited capacity to control their rented spaces contributes to alienation. Although they may not legally own them, community residents may claim “symbolic ownership” of their neighborhood (Deener, 2007; Martucci, 2019). As identified in early studies of diverse communities, the demarcation of neighborhood and community boundaries carries the notion that areas “must ‘belong’ to someone” and some people, but not others, “belong” within boundaries (Suttles, 1968; Zorbaugh, 1929).…”