2021
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01402-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-acting β2-agonist prescriptions are associated with poor clinical outcomes of asthma: the multi-country, cross-sectional SABINA III study

Abstract: BackgroundTo gain a global perspective on short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) prescriptions and associated asthma-related clinical outcomes in patients with asthma, we assessed primary health data across 24 countries in 5 continents.MethodsSABINA III was a cross-sectional study that employed electronic case report forms at a study visit (in primary or specialist care) to record prescribed medication(s), over-the-counter (OTC) SABA purchase, and clinical outcomes in asthma patients (≥12 years old) during the past 12… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
115
2
8

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
115
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, our findings are limited to specific countries in North America and Europe; however, further SABINA analyses evaluating the association of SABA exposure with multiple asthma outcomes in an additional 24 countries across 5 continents are now available. 48…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, our findings are limited to specific countries in North America and Europe; however, further SABINA analyses evaluating the association of SABA exposure with multiple asthma outcomes in an additional 24 countries across 5 continents are now available. 48…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Use of ≥3 SABA canisters/year is considered undesirable since it indicates overreliance on SABA for the management of persistent symptoms, usually related to the underuse of ICS and other controllers. 18 We also analysed the SABA overprescriptions among asthma severity groups (Table 3). The SABA over-prescription in mild asthma patients was 17.9%, and 40% in the moderate-tosevere asthma group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anti-inflammatory reliever approach which contains combination of a rapidonset bronchodilator and ICS has been shown to be highly effective in mild asthma, where it may be used without maintenance dosing, and in moderate to severe asthma with fixed daily dosing of the same combination as maintenance treatment. 18 Low dose ICS/formoterol as reliever in mild asthma and on top of ICS/formoterol regular daily treatment in moderate and severe asthma has become the preferred approach in the GINA report. 19 Despite advances in disease understanding, asthma management guidelines and the availability of effective treatment, poor asthma control remains a major problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second set of studies will use SABA prescription/possession data from SABINA studies as well as inhaler sales data to evaluate emissions linked to SABA use versus all inhaler use, and that of SABA overuse in asthma. The analyses on SABA overuse will be conducted in patients (at least 12 years of age) as part of the SABINA studies [22,23,33] in Europe and Canada (SABA CARBON Europe-Canada), USA (SABA CARBON USA) and in other mostly lowand middle-income countries outside of Europe (SABA CARBON International).…”
Section: Design Of the Carbon Programmementioning
confidence: 99%