2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short and long-term impacts of nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
177
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
17
177
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This results in a ratio of approx. 3:2 between plant and soil N retention and corroborates well with ecosystem partitioning of C sequestration with N deposition (De Vries et al 2014). It is notable that some processes responsible for soil N retention are not fully captured by the model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This results in a ratio of approx. 3:2 between plant and soil N retention and corroborates well with ecosystem partitioning of C sequestration with N deposition (De Vries et al 2014). It is notable that some processes responsible for soil N retention are not fully captured by the model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…We found a significant mean annual increase of +0.07 to +0.43 kg N ha showing that chronic N deposition stimulates tree growth only to a certain level (de Vries et al 2014) and may even be adverse at high levels of N deposition (Magill et al 2004). Significant retention of additional N in SOM occurred together with tree N uptake and was between +0.02 and +0.3 kg N ha −1 y −1 with every additional kilogram N per hectare in deposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Most increases in aboveground biomass from increased N deposition are allocated to stems [42,50,51], particularly for small-diameter trees [52]. This response results in faster biomass accumulation, which produces taller, skinnier trees [52].…”
Section: Observations Of N Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the increase in growth is not consistent or linear for all species. For example, de Vries et al [50] found that tropical forests had the least response to N deposition compared to temperate and boreal forests, and in some cases a negative growth relationship exists at high N inputs [49]. Herbaceous plants also experience biomass increases from N deposition [48,54], and under low levels of N deposition they can increase aboveground biomass more than trees [51].…”
Section: Observations Of N Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long et al, 2004), but also to changes in regional O 3 concentrations -affecting plant performance and, thus, e.g. plant litter production or transpiration -and/or atmospheric deposition of reactive nitrogen , which not only is an additional N r source for soil microbial processes but also drives forest C sequestration and changes in soil C and N stocks (De Vries et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%