2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.103614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short- and long-term memory for pitch and non-pitch contours: Insights from congenital amusia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution of bottom-up aspects of pitch encoding to account for the differences between musicians and non-musicians should be minimal. Indeed, the smallest pitch changes to be detected correspond to a 2-octave shift in the global task, and equal or larger than 400 cents in the local task, which is largely higher than the justnoticeable-differences (JNDs) typically measured with isolated pure tones in naive listeners 32 . Rather, the present results can best be understood in the context of "informational masking", in line with studies reporting JNDs of several thousands hertz when measured using random tone sequences varying in large frequency ranges 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The contribution of bottom-up aspects of pitch encoding to account for the differences between musicians and non-musicians should be minimal. Indeed, the smallest pitch changes to be detected correspond to a 2-octave shift in the global task, and equal or larger than 400 cents in the local task, which is largely higher than the justnoticeable-differences (JNDs) typically measured with isolated pure tones in naive listeners 32 . Rather, the present results can best be understood in the context of "informational masking", in line with studies reporting JNDs of several thousands hertz when measured using random tone sequences varying in large frequency ranges 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Another issue where uncertainty manipulations can be particularly informative is whether deficits in amusics are restricted to pitch information, or whether they extend to other musical features. While some studies indicate spared rhythm and beat perception (Graves et al, 2019; Phillips-Silver et al, 2013) and spared use of tempo (Gosselin, Paquette, & Peretz, 2015), timbre (Jiang, Liu, & Wong, 2017), or loudness (Graves et al, 2019) cues, others report impaired contour (Graves et al, 2019) and timbre perception in amusics (Marin, Gingras, & Stewart, 2012; Omigie, Pearce, & Stewart, 2012; Tillmann, Schulze, & Foxton, 2009). Crucially, some evidence suggests that deficits in other features appear once the pitch information—or otherwise spectral information such as timbre—of musical pieces becomes complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the contribution of bottom-up aspects of pitch encoding to account for the differences between musicians and non-musicians should be minimal. Indeed, the minimal pitch changes to be detected in our task were cents (local condition with k-ratio=1/3), which is higher than the just-noticeable-differences (JNDs) typically measured with isolated pure tones in naive listeners (Graves et al, 2019). Rather, our results can be best understood in the context of "informational masking", consistent with studies reporting JNDs of several thousands hertz when measured using random tone sequences varying in large frequency ranges (Watson, 2005).…”
Section: Candidate Mechanisms Governing Local-global Processing Reorgmentioning
confidence: 58%