2006
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short- and long-term population dynamical consequences of asymmetric climate change in black grouse

Abstract: Temporal asymmetry in patterns of regional climate change may jeopardize the match between the proximate and ultimate cues of the timing of breeding. The consequences on short-and long-term population dynamics and trends as well as the underlying mechanisms are, however, often unknown. Using long-term data from Finland, we demonstrate that black grouse (Tetrao tetrix) have responded to spring warming by advancing both egg-laying and hatching. However, early summer (the time of hatching) has not advanced, and c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
137
5
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
137
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Strong selection pressures may lead to population declines unless evolution can keep pace with the rate of environmental change (24,29) or efforts to reverse habitat fragmentation and increase landscape permeability are sufficient to increase the frequency of long-distance dispersal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong selection pressures may lead to population declines unless evolution can keep pace with the rate of environmental change (24,29) or efforts to reverse habitat fragmentation and increase landscape permeability are sufficient to increase the frequency of long-distance dispersal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a climatic mismatch is comparable to previous findings in Finnish black grouse ( Tetrao tetrix ), where spring, but not summer temperatures, had increased, leading to earlier breeding but increased chick mortality due to hatching when climatic conditions were suboptimal (Ludwig et al. 2006). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include noise (uncontrolled variation in habitat classification and capercaillie density), climatic conditions (variation in winter survival and breeding success) (e.g. Ludwig et al 2006) as well as hunting and predation pressure (geographical variation in predator assemblages) (Helle & Helle 1991, Storch 2000, Kauhala & Helle 2002 among others. On the other hand, the large size and the regular shape guarantee the approximate randomness of the wildlife triangles (Lindén et al 1996), and as there was on average, a high number of counted transect in each grid cell (> 1000 km in all regions), capercaillie densities within the grid cells are most probably representative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%