2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019ja026919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short‐ and Long‐Wavelength TIDs Generated by the Great American Eclipse of 21 August 2017

Abstract: On the 21 August 2017 the eclipse shadow drastically changed the state of the ionosphere over the United States. This effect on the ionosphere is visible in the total electron content measured by Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS). The shadow moved with the supersonic speed of~1,000 m/s over Oregon to~650 m/s over South Carolina. In order to exhaustively explore the ionospheric signature of the eclipse, we use data of total electron content from~3,000 GNSS stations seeing multiple Global Positioning Sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This estimated shadow migration velocity is relatively less as compared to the similarly estimated velocity (0.74 km s −1 , Kundu et al, 2018) during the 21 August 2017 total solar eclipse over the United States. The 2017 total solar eclipse had a faster moving shadow which triggered bow waves, in addition to the TEC depletion by the moon shadow (Eisenbeis et al, 2019). However, in the present case of 2019 annular solar eclipse, the shadow migration velocity is relatively slower which may not have generated the bow waves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This estimated shadow migration velocity is relatively less as compared to the similarly estimated velocity (0.74 km s −1 , Kundu et al, 2018) during the 21 August 2017 total solar eclipse over the United States. The 2017 total solar eclipse had a faster moving shadow which triggered bow waves, in addition to the TEC depletion by the moon shadow (Eisenbeis et al, 2019). However, in the present case of 2019 annular solar eclipse, the shadow migration velocity is relatively slower which may not have generated the bow waves.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Eisenbeis et al (2019), using 3,000 GNSS receivers to determine the TEC, found that a 3-D fast Fourier transform analysis permits the full identification of TIDs generated by an eclipse. They found that these TIDs exhibit wavelengths and periods of 50-100 km and 30 min, respectively, and 500-600 km and 65 min.…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Space Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, Mrak, Semeter, Drob, et al (2018) and Mrak, Semeter, Nishimura, et al (2018) suggested that (a) the TEC observations and modeling results can be explained by the coincidental production of TIDs by tropospheric storm waves that propagate radially from the storm center with a horizontal wavelength of 350 km and a velocity of~200 m s −1 and that (b) the prominent large-scale TEC disturbances are produced by direct EUV modulation due to the inhomogeneity of solar radiation. Furthermore, Eisenbeis et al (2019), using 3,000 GNSS receivers to determine the TEC, found that a 3-D fast Fourier transform analysis permits the full identification of TIDs generated by an eclipse. They found that these TIDs exhibit wavelengths and periods of 50-100 km and 30 min, respectively, and 500-600 km and 65 min.…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Space Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the Great American Eclipse, which passed through the continental United States from northwest to southeast on 21 August 2017, offered a rare opportunity to study the midlatitude ionosphere and thermosphere response in detail with unprecedented dense observational instruments. Besides the above‐mentioned eclipse effects, a number of interesting findings were reported as well, such as large‐scale TEC and NmF 2 depletion for more than 50% (e.g., Cherniak & Zakharenkova, 2018; Coster et al, 2017; Reinisch et al, 2018), traveling ionospheric disturbances and thermospheric wave (e.g., Eisenbeis et al, 2019; Harding et al, 2018; Mrak et al, 2018; Nayak & Yiǧit, 2018; Pradipta et al, 2018; Zhang et al, 2017), enhanced and long‐lasting posteclipse response (e.g., Lei, Dang, et al, 2018; Wu et al, 2018), and topside ionosphere composition change and interhemispheric ion flows (e.g., Perry et al, 2019; Yau et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%