2011
DOI: 10.1583/11-3621.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short- and Midterm Results of the Fascia Suture Technique for Closure of Femoral Artery Access Sites After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Abstract: The fascia suture technique seems to be safe, effective, and simple to use for closing percutaneous access sites after EVAR. Complications are rare, and the outcome is not affected by obesity, femoral calcification, or femoral artery stenosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seven small pseudoaneurysms (<1 cm) after fascia closure (n ¼ 78) were found but none warranted repair. 9 Two cases of aneurysm growth between the pre-operative CTA and the post-operative CTA were found. In one of these cases the expansion was combined with a type 2 endoleak at 1 month.…”
Section: Fu Ctamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Seven small pseudoaneurysms (<1 cm) after fascia closure (n ¼ 78) were found but none warranted repair. 9 Two cases of aneurysm growth between the pre-operative CTA and the post-operative CTA were found. In one of these cases the expansion was combined with a type 2 endoleak at 1 month.…”
Section: Fu Ctamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Meticulous surgical technique in terms of arteriotomy and subcutaneous tissue closure and approximation and routine use of drains, where indicated, are necessary to avoid such complications. Meticulous fascial closure is necessary in this population as it has been shown to decrease access site complications [35]. Other interventions such as the use of platelet derived products have also been advocated, but cost remains a significant issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strength of the study is that no external compression was allowed, whereas it was in another report. 17 Vascular surgeons performed the majority of the procedures, which may have been beneficial for FST as it utilizes standard surgical materials and technique. The Prostar technique has the advantage of maintaining EVAR as a strictly percutaneous procedure while the FST requires a limited groin dissection to the femoral fascia, which is an uncommon procedure for interventional radiologists.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%