2017
DOI: 10.1089/aid.2017.0084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short Communication: False Recent Ratio of the Limiting-Antigen Avidity Assay and Viral Load Testing Algorithm Among Cameroonians with Long-Term HIV Infection

Abstract: Current serological assays that are used for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation have been shown to misclassify individuals with chronic infection. Limited information exists on the performance of cross-sectional incidence assays in Central Africa. HIV-positive individuals from Cameroon who were infected for at least 1 or 2 years were evaluated to determine the false recent ratio (FRR) of a two-assay algorithm, which includes the Limiting Antigen Avidity (LAg-Avidity) assay (normalized optical density uni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence was calculated based on recent infection assays which may vary according to the different HIV subtypes. Possible misclassifications using standard LAg avidity assay and VL algorithm had been reported in Cameroun [6]. Cameroon has a similar subtype distribution as Nigeria although the circulating viral subtypes may be similar, our study did not determine it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The incidence was calculated based on recent infection assays which may vary according to the different HIV subtypes. Possible misclassifications using standard LAg avidity assay and VL algorithm had been reported in Cameroun [6]. Cameroon has a similar subtype distribution as Nigeria although the circulating viral subtypes may be similar, our study did not determine it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Several assays that classify HIV-reactive specimens have been developed or adapted to distinguish recent or long-term infected persons based on the maturation of the immune response. However, the development of HIV incidence assays has been challenging due to factors such as variability in immune responses at an individual and population level, variability by HIV-1 subtype, access to antiretroviral therapy, decreases in the genetic diversity of the HIV in the era of antiretroviral therapy, advanced HIV disease and other factors that are not well understood that can lead to misclassification of individuals [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of a paucity of specimens that belong to subtypes other than those shown in Tables 1 and 2 in the panels used to calibrate the algorithm (i.e., determine the MDRI and FRR), surveys conducted in some regions of the world where such subtypes are prevalent will need to use an MDRI and FRR derived from much smaller data sets (e.g., CRF01_AE) 50 or estimated in the absence of complete calibration data (e.g., subtype F, G, CRF02_AG, or other CRFs). 69 For CRF01_AE, the published MDRI for the LAg assay was derived using slightly different methods than those shown in Table 1, and thus may not be directly comparable to these values; furthermore, an FRR for CRF01_AE was not reported. 50 However, the MDRI that has been calculated is very similar to the subtype B estimate (122 vs. 129 days), suggesting that using subtype B MDRI and FRR for CRF01_AE may be an acceptable approximation.…”
Section: Hiv-1 Subtype Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 , 2 Point-of-care rapid testing for recent HIV infection (RTRI), which aims to detect HIV infection acquired within 12 months, has recently become available and is being scaled up under the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) to describe shifting dynamics in the HIV epidemic and to interrupt active HIV transmission networks. 3–6 To minimize the proportion false recent (PFR), viral load (VL) testing is used to confirm a recent infection as part of a recent infection testing algorithm (RITA), 7–10 but is not practiced in all PEPFAR programs in Africa, where the PFR can be high, 11 , 12 due to limits in the availability of VL testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%