Short defeat and entrapment scale: A psychometric investigation in three German samples

Höller, Inken; Teismann, Tobias; Cwik, Jan Christopher; Glaesmer, Heide; Spangenberg, Lena; Hallensleben, Nina; Paashaus, Laura; Rath, Dajana; Schönfelder, Antje; Juckel, Georg; Forkmann, Thomas

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152160

Cited by 16 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Higher scores indicate stronger perceptions of defeat and entrapment. Because recent research has demonstrated that the scale is best understood in terms of two factors (Forkmann, Teismann, Stenzel, Glaesmer & De Beurs, 2018; Höller et al., 2020), defeat and entrapment were analysed separately in the present study. Sum scores range from 0 to 16 for both scales with higher scores indicating higher feelings of defeat and entrapment.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Höller et al. (2020) showed good internal consistencies for the German version of the defeat scale (Cronbach's α Defeat = 0.85‐0.88) and good internal consistencies for the German version of the entrapment scale (Cronbach's α Entrapment = 0.65‐0.83) as well as good validity. Internal consistency was good in the present sample (Cronbach's α Defeat = 0.91, Cronbach's α Entrapment = 0.88).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Ambivalent heroism? – Psychological burden and suicidal ideation among nurses during the Covid‐19 pandemic

Höller

Forkmann

2021

Nursing Open

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim During the Covid‐19 pandemic, the risk for nurses’ mental health has rapidly increased. The two main goals of this study were the examination of (1) the psychological burden and (2) of suicidal ideation and its associated risk factors one year after the Covid‐19 pandemic begun. Design This was a cross‐sectional online survey. Methods N = 1311 nurses (96.9% female) aged 18–63 years (M = 30.96, SD = 8.48) were assessed for various symptoms of psychological burden, suicidal ideation and behaviour and its risk factors. Results Almost half of participants (41.5%) reported heightened levels of depressive symptoms, 691 (52.7%) reported a medium to high risk for burnout. One fifth of participants (21.7%) reported suicidal ideation in the past 4 weeks. The direct contact to people with Covid‐19 was not related to the extent of the psychological burden. Depression, agitation, perceived burdensomeness and previous suicide attempt were associated with suicidal ideation.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ambivalent heroism? – Psychological burden and suicidal ideation among nurses during the Covid‐19 pandemic

Höller

Forkmann

2021

Nursing Open

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Short Defeat and Entrapment Scale (SDES; Höller et al, 2020). Die SDES erfasst mit acht Items den Eindruck von gegenwärtigen Anforderungen überfordert zu werden (defeat) bzw.…”

Section: Psychometrische Verfahrenunclassified

Skala Suizidales Erleben und Verhalten (SSEV)

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Zusammenfassung. Suizidales Erleben und Verhalten ist in klinischen Kontexten sehr verbreitet. Während international diverse Messinstrumente zur Erfassung von Suizidalität entwickelt und validiert wurden, gibt es nur wenige deutsche Messinstrumente. In der vorliegenden Studie wurde die neu entwickelte Skala Suizidales Erleben und Verhalten (SSEV) in fünf Stichproben mit insgesamt N = 1 099 Proband_innen im Hinblick auf ihre psychometrischen Eigenschaften untersucht. Die faktorenanalytische Untersuchung (explorative und konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse) ergab eine eindimensionale Struktur des Fragebogens. Die interne Konsistenz der SSEV ist hoch und es zeigten sich erwartungsgemäß positive Zusammenhänge zu diversen Maßen aktueller Theoriemodelle suizidalen Erlebens und Verhaltens, sowie zu Depressivität, Angst und Stress. Weitere Analysen zeigten erwartungskonform negative Zusammenhänge mit sozialer Unterstützung und positiver mentaler Gesundheit. Insgesamt verweisen die Ergebnisse darauf, dass es sich beim SSEV um ein reliables und valides Instrument zur Erfassung von akutem suizidalem Erleben und Verhalten handelt, welches in der Forschung und der klinischen Praxis angewendet werden kann.

show abstract

“…Defeat and entrapment were assessed using the short defeat and entrapment scale (SDES, [19]; German version: [57]), with four items assessing defeat on a five-point Likert scale from "never" (0) to "always" (4) and four items assessing entrapment on a five-point Likert scale from "not at all" (0) to "very strongly" (4). Higher scores indicate higher levels of defeat and entrapment.…”

Section: Baseline Assessment (T0)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Do Feelings of Defeat and Entrapment Change over Time? An Investigation of the Integrated Motivational—Volitional Model of Suicidal Behaviour Using Ecological Momentary Assessments

Stenzel

Höller

Rath

et al. 2020

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

(1) Background. Defeat and entrapment have been highlighted as major risk factors of suicidal ideation and behavior. Nevertheless, little is known about their short-term variability and their longitudinal association in real-time. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether defeat and entrapment change over time and whether defeat predicts entrapment as stated by the integrated motivational–volitional model of suicidal behavior. (2) Methods. Healthy participants (n = 61) underwent a 7-day smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) on suicidal ideation/behavior and relevant risk factors, including defeat and entrapment and a comprehensive baseline (T0) and post (T2) assessment. (3) Results. Mean squared successive differences (MSSD) and intraclass correlations (ICC) support the temporal instability as well as within-person variability of defeat and entrapment. Multilevel analyses revealed that during EMA, defeat was positively associated with entrapment at the same measurement. However, defeat could not predict entrapment to the next measurement (approximately two hours later). (4) Conclusion. This study provides evidence on the short-term variability of defeat and entrapment highlighting that repeated measurement of defeat and entrapment—preferably in real time—is necessary in order to adequately capture the actual empirical relations of these variables and not to overlook significant within-person variability. Further research—especially within clinical samples—seems warranted.

show abstract

Short defeat and entrapment scale: A psychometric investigation in three German samples

Cited by 16 publications

References 36 publications

Ambivalent heroism? – Psychological burden and suicidal ideation among nurses during the Covid‐19 pandemic

Ambivalent heroism? – Psychological burden and suicidal ideation among nurses during the Covid‐19 pandemic

Skala Suizidales Erleben und Verhalten (SSEV)

Do Feelings of Defeat and Entrapment Change over Time? An Investigation of the Integrated Motivational—Volitional Model of Suicidal Behaviour Using Ecological Momentary Assessments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About