2008
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01274.2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Latency Crossed Inhibitory Responses in Extensor Muscles During Locomotion in the Cat

Abstract: During locomotion, contacting an obstacle generates a coordinated response involving flexion of the stimulated leg and activation of extensors contralaterally to ensure adequate support and forward progression. Activation of motoneurons innervating contralateral muscles (i.e., crossed extensor reflex) has always been described as an excitation, but the present paper shows that excitatory responses during locomotion are almost always preceded by a short period of inhibition. Data from seven cats chronically imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 5) or the activation of crossed inhibitory pathways (Arya et al 1991; Aggelopoulos & Edgley, 1995; Aggelopoulos et al 1996; Frigon & Rossignol, 2008 c ). Crossed flexion has been reported in the cat following acute spinalization (Rossignol & Gauthier, 1980).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 5) or the activation of crossed inhibitory pathways (Arya et al 1991; Aggelopoulos & Edgley, 1995; Aggelopoulos et al 1996; Frigon & Rossignol, 2008 c ). Crossed flexion has been reported in the cat following acute spinalization (Rossignol & Gauthier, 1980).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earlier onset of responses could be due to the fact that larger responses are easier to delineate and/or that an inhibitory influence was removed. For instance, a short‐latency inhibitory pathway projects from cutaneous afferents of the foot to contralateral extensors (Edgley & Aggelopoulos, 2006; Frigon & Rossignol, 2008) and may project to several motor pools. In this scenario, spinalization reduced the efficacy of the crossed inhibitory pathways and consequently responses occurred earlier, although this requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…automatic gain control) with the level of EMG activity (Matthews, 1986), the subtracted value was then divided by a fixed 15 ms block of blEMG in the same phase (see Fig. 1 of Frigon & Rossignol, 2008 for an example), thus giving a reflex amplitude normalized to the level of baseline locomotor activity. Inhibitory responses, in our context, can only be quantified when there is a baseline level of EMG.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because reflex amplitude is known to scale (i.e., automatic gain control) with the level of EMG activity (Matthews 1986), the subtracted value was then divided by a fixed 15-ms block of blEMG in the same phase (for an example, see Fig. 1 of Frigon and Rossignol 2008b), thus giving a reflex amplitude normalized to the level of baseline locomotor activity. For St and TA, reflex responses evoked during swing (data points at phases 0.05 to 0.35) and those evoked during stance (data points at phases 0.45 to 0.85) were averaged together to provide an average reflex response during swing and stance, respectively.…”
Section: Tibial Nerve Stimulation and Reflexesmentioning
confidence: 99%