2013 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference 2013
DOI: 10.1109/vnc.2013.6737611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short paper: Establishing trust in a vehicular network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, the information being exchanged between the vehicles can be extended with more details about position, speed and various other sensor data readings. Moreover, while our framework allows a vehicle to explicitly trust one or more neighbouring vehicles, it would be interesting to allow multiple trust levels [17] that can be based on historical interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the information being exchanged between the vehicles can be extended with more details about position, speed and various other sensor data readings. Moreover, while our framework allows a vehicle to explicitly trust one or more neighbouring vehicles, it would be interesting to allow multiple trust levels [17] that can be based on historical interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their method therefore makes contributions to building centralized trust management system. Machado and Venkatasubramanian [15] aim to aggregate advantages of both centralized and distributed trust computation. The authors categorize the messages exchanged in VANET into alerts and reports; alerts are time-critical in response to an incident while reports are evidence to evaluate quality of alerts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Road-Side Units) into consideration when making decisions regarding content plausibility. [18], [22] and [28] all propose reputation-based systems to pinpoint the attackers that inject bogus information to the network. These systems defend against the use of blatantly wrong or implausible values, which led our bots to carefully craft their fake congestion information sent.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%