2018
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2018.2805162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Period Superconducting Undulator Coils With Neutral Poles: Test Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2016, Mezentsev et al for the first time reported the development of a 15-period HR NbTi planar SCU15.6 model with active/neutral poles and experimentally demonstrated that the prototype could reach an on-axis field B 0 of 1.2 T at 8 m magnetic gap [86]. In 2017, Bragin et al reported the development of a 40-period SCU15.6 prototype and experimentally demonstrated that an on-axis field B 0 of 1.2 T could be obtained after training quenches and the RMS phase error was ∼3.5 • -4 • [87]. In 2021, BINP reported the latest test of a 119-period SCU15.6 model, as shown in figure 9; this 2 m long model also reached an on-axis field B 0 of 1.2 T after one thermal cycle and training quenches [88].…”
Section: Vr Rebco Planarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2016, Mezentsev et al for the first time reported the development of a 15-period HR NbTi planar SCU15.6 model with active/neutral poles and experimentally demonstrated that the prototype could reach an on-axis field B 0 of 1.2 T at 8 m magnetic gap [86]. In 2017, Bragin et al reported the development of a 40-period SCU15.6 prototype and experimentally demonstrated that an on-axis field B 0 of 1.2 T could be obtained after training quenches and the RMS phase error was ∼3.5 • -4 • [87]. In 2021, BINP reported the latest test of a 119-period SCU15.6 model, as shown in figure 9; this 2 m long model also reached an on-axis field B 0 of 1.2 T after one thermal cycle and training quenches [88].…”
Section: Vr Rebco Planarmentioning
confidence: 99%