2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2019.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-T2 MRI: Principles and recent advances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 319 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is already visible in XI for an acquisition time of 4 ms. Previously explored alternatives to short-T imaging 23 are the acquisition of a second gradient echo by flipping the gradient polarity 17 , or the reduction of the number of single points by means of a ramped hybrid encoding 24 . However, they both lead to artifacts in our setup due to eddy currents induced during gradient switching.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is already visible in XI for an acquisition time of 4 ms. Previously explored alternatives to short-T imaging 23 are the acquisition of a second gradient echo by flipping the gradient polarity 17 , or the reduction of the number of single points by means of a ramped hybrid encoding 24 . However, they both lead to artifacts in our setup due to eddy currents induced during gradient switching.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the head sample the issue was avoided altogether since no comparison of different gradient strength images was performed, and for the foot sample the sweep pulse was largely spectrally uniform, producing images free of pulse‐induced weighting. Another potential image bias may arise from the spectral response of the RF coil, 24 as suggested by the limited bandwidth of the solenoid coil of 0.67 MHz. In analogy with the pulse, the effect of the associated weighing of the individual projections for the 3D radial data is relatively benign, and no related intensity variation was apparent in the images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images were then reconstructed using 2 different trajectories: the nominal-and the GIRF-corrected trajectory. The employed sequence parameters were TE 0.14 ms/ 2.2 ms, TR 7.6 ms, flip angle 5°, in-plane resolution 0.6 × 0.6 mm 2 , slice thickness 1 mm, FOV 210 × 210 × 100 mm 3 , dwell time 1.84 μs, ramp length 0.15 ms, maximum gradient strength 30.36 mT/m, acquisition window 0.72 ms, 704 spokes, 393 samples, scan time of 6.15 min, and SENSE acceleration factor of 2 in the Cartesian-sampled dimension.…”
Section: Phantom Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the spine measurements, a single UTE was acquired using the built-in-table 16-channel posterior coil and the following parameters: TE 0.14 ms, TR 6.3 ms, flip angle 5°, in-plane resolution 0.45 × 0.45 mm 2 , slice thickness 3 mm, FOV 250 × 250 × 279 mm 3 , ramp length 0.08 ms, maximum gradient strength 15.04 mT/m, dwell time 3.12 μs, acquisition window 1.77 ms, 945 spokes, 568 samples, radial percentage of 85%, half-scan factor of 0.6 in slice direction, and scan time of 6.3 min.…”
Section: In Vivo Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation