2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(01)00062-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short term and long term effects of enhanced auditory feedback on typing force, EMG, and comfort while typing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
18
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study with regard to increasing the subject's awareness of unnecessary muscle activity levels through biofeedback are consistent with earlier studies as the subjects reduced their muscle activity (Gerard et al, 2002;Hermens and Hutten, 2002;van Dijk and Hermens, 2006). Auditory biofeedback presented to subjects performing a gross-motor task, showed an increase in the relative rest time and a decrease in muscle activity (Voerman et al, 2004).…”
Section: Effect Of Biofeedback Musclesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the present study with regard to increasing the subject's awareness of unnecessary muscle activity levels through biofeedback are consistent with earlier studies as the subjects reduced their muscle activity (Gerard et al, 2002;Hermens and Hutten, 2002;van Dijk and Hermens, 2006). Auditory biofeedback presented to subjects performing a gross-motor task, showed an increase in the relative rest time and a decrease in muscle activity (Voerman et al, 2004).…”
Section: Effect Of Biofeedback Musclesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…auditory (Gerard et al, 2002), visually (Palmerud et al, 1995), and vibratory signal (de Korte et al, 2008;Vollenbroek-Hutten et al, 2006). However, previous studies have not demonstrated one mode being more effective than the other with regard to reducing muscle activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…there is ample evidence to suggest (Gerard, Armstrong, Rempel, & Woolley, 2002;Rempel et al, 1997) that the design of modern computer keys serves to constrain, but not control, the force used to respond to stimuli.…”
Section: Stockholm University Stockholm Swedenmentioning
confidence: 99%