2007
DOI: 10.1097/wnr.0b013e3282202c1f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term cortical reorganization by deafferentation of the contralateral sensory cortex

Abstract: The topographic arrangement of the human primary somatosensory cortex following deafferentation of the contralateral cortex has been investigated by means of dipole source analysis. Somatosensory-evoked potentials were obtained by electrical stimulation of digit 1 and digit 5 of the left hand before and after anesthesia of digits 2-4 of the right hand during different terms of attention. Anesthesia induced an expansion of the three-dimensional distance between digits 1 and 5. This suggests intercortical plasti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in agreement with earlier animal and human studies showing that deafferentation is associated with changes in neuronal organization in the cortex and subcortical areas. These changes are associated with warm and referred sensations, perceptual illusions, neuropathic pain, and enhanced sensorimotor function of nondeafferented areas (Björkman et al, 2004(Björkman et al, , 2005Kanai et al, 2010;Lundborg, 2000;Mihic and Pinckert, 1981;Navarro et al, 2007;Paqueron et al, 2003;Rinaldi et al, 1991;Silva et al, 2011;Waberski et al, 2007;Weiss et al, 2004;Werhahn et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings are in agreement with earlier animal and human studies showing that deafferentation is associated with changes in neuronal organization in the cortex and subcortical areas. These changes are associated with warm and referred sensations, perceptual illusions, neuropathic pain, and enhanced sensorimotor function of nondeafferented areas (Björkman et al, 2004(Björkman et al, , 2005Kanai et al, 2010;Lundborg, 2000;Mihic and Pinckert, 1981;Navarro et al, 2007;Paqueron et al, 2003;Rinaldi et al, 1991;Silva et al, 2011;Waberski et al, 2007;Weiss et al, 2004;Werhahn et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The authors argue that these changes are related to the loss of inhibitory influences within these brain neuronal networks. There is general agreement in the literature that deafferentation causes a rebalancing of excitatory and inhibitory neuronal activity toward disinhibition exposing formerly masked excitatory connections (Björkman et al, 2005;Faggin et al, 1997;Kaas, 1999;Nicolelis et al, 1993;Pawela et al, 2006;Seminowicz et al, 2012;Waberski et al, 2007;Weiss et al, 2007;Wernhahn et al, 2002). Krupa et al (1999) further show that also feedback from cortex to thalamus plays an important role in plastic changes due to deafferentation [see also Kaas (1999)].…”
Section: Effect Of Deafferentation On Canonical Resting-state Networkmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The commonest way used so far to assess cortical somatotopic representation changes, both in healthy subjects and patients, has been dipolar source modeling of somatosensory evoked potentials and fields (SEPs-SEFs) to face and/or upper limb stimulation Flor et al, 1995;Grü sser et al, 2001;Karl et al, 2001;Montoya et al, 1998;Rossini et al, 1998;Schaefer et al, 2002a,b;Schwenkreis et al, 2001;Soros et al, 2001;Tecchio et al, 2002;Vartiainen et al, 2009;Waberski et al, 2007]. Although ''shrinking'' of the upper limb representation, with medial displacement of the face area after amputation is often reported, the correlation between plasticity in S1 and pain remains elusive, a close correlation being observed in a number of studies Flor et al, 1995Flor et al, , 1998Grü sser et al, 2001;Karl et al, 2001;Montoya et al, 1998;Tecchio et al, 2002] but not in others [Schwenkreis et al, 2001;Vartiainen et al, 2009].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%