Study design: Investigation of ®ve patients receiving an implant, using laboratory cystometry and self-catheterisation at home. Objectives: To use the established Finetech-Brindley sacral root stimulator to increase bladder capacity by neuromodulation, eliminating the need for posterior rhizotomy, as well as achieving bladder emptying by neurostimulation. Setting: Spinal Injuries Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK. Methods: Five patients underwent implantation of a Finetech-Brindley stimulator without rhizotomy of the posterior roots. This was either a two channel extradural device (four cases) or a three channel intrathecal device (one case). In each patient, the implant was con®gured as a Sacral Posterior and Anterior Root Stimulator (SPARS). Postoperatively, repeated provocations using rapid instillation of 60 ml saline were used to determine the relative thresholds for neuromodulation using each channel. The eect of continuous neuromodulation was examined in the laboratory using slow ®ll cystometrograms, and conditional stimulation was also studied (neuromodulation for 1 min to suppress hyperre¯exic contractions as they occurred). In one patient, neuromodulation was applied continuously at home, and volumes at self catheterisation recorded in a diary. Results: Re¯ex erections were preserved in each patient. In three patients, detrusor hyperre¯exia persisted postoperatively and neuromodulation via the implant was studied. In these three patients, the con®guration was: S2 mixed roots bilaterally (channel B), and S34 bilaterally (channel A). Both channels could be used to suppress provoked hyperre¯exic contractions, with the S2 channel eective at a shorter pulse width than S34 in a majority of cases. Continuous stimulation more than doubled bladder capacity in two out of three patients during slow ®ll cystometry. Conditional stimulation was highly eective. In the one patient who used continuous stimulation at home, bladder capacity was more than doubled and the eect was comparable with anticholinergic medication. Bladder pressures 470 cm water could be achieved with intense stimulation in three patients, but detrusor-external urethral sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) prevented complete emptying. Conclusions: Neuromodulation via a SPARS was eective and may replace the need for posterior rhizotomy. However, persisting DSD may prevent complete bladder emptying and warrants further investigation.