2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2009.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term effects of conservation agriculture on Vertisols under tef (Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter) in the northern Ethiopian highlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.6), and the resulting estimates of the RUSLE model. Reduction in runoff on raised beds under minimum or no tillage has been reported before for other soils (Boulal et al, 2008;Jordán et al, 2010;Verhulst et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2007), as well as reduction of soil loss under permanent beds (Oicha et al, 2010). Reduction of soil loss was attributed to increased soil macro-porosity associated with greater macro-fauna activity (Kay and Vanden Bygaart, 2002;Ruan et al, 2001;Trojan and Linden, 1998), reduced soil surface sealing (Mannering and Meyer, 1963), and increased soil surface roughness through the presence of crop residues, which enhance flow path tortuosity slowing down the water flow rate across the soil surface (Findeling et al, 2003).…”
Section: Runoff and Erosionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…3.6), and the resulting estimates of the RUSLE model. Reduction in runoff on raised beds under minimum or no tillage has been reported before for other soils (Boulal et al, 2008;Jordán et al, 2010;Verhulst et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2007), as well as reduction of soil loss under permanent beds (Oicha et al, 2010). Reduction of soil loss was attributed to increased soil macro-porosity associated with greater macro-fauna activity (Kay and Vanden Bygaart, 2002;Ruan et al, 2001;Trojan and Linden, 1998), reduced soil surface sealing (Mannering and Meyer, 1963), and increased soil surface roughness through the presence of crop residues, which enhance flow path tortuosity slowing down the water flow rate across the soil surface (Findeling et al, 2003).…”
Section: Runoff and Erosionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…These processes lead to increased runoff and erosion losses that are strongly linked to topsoil. Therefore, the practice of judicial water conservation undoubtedly plays a significant role in increasing agricultural production in the sub-humid areas where agriculture is hampered by periodic droughts and low soil fertility (Oicha et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher SMC (%) was observed under EBCSTS than CBCVTS land use types. This was due to the presence of higher SOC (%) and hence formation of stable soil aggregate in EBCSTS [4,6,29,36,43]. Concurrently, higher SMC (%) was observed at 15-30 cm across land use types (Table 3).…”
Section: Soil Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bulk density was lower in soil under the EBCSTS than in CBCVTS (Table 3). This was due to continuous addition of soil organic residues on the surface soil layer [2,6,35,36]. In CBCVTS, the continuous tillage operation and thereby lowering of soil organic carbon (SOC) might have contributed for increased soil bulk density [6,13,29,31,[37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Soil Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%