2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.11.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Term Effects of Global Pelvic Manipulation on Knee Joint Position Sense in Asymptomatic Participants: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that by providing motor control with spinal manipulation, improvement in joint position sense can be achieved [39]. In a double-blind randomized controlled study in healthy individuals; a single session of pelvic manipulation did not provide a statistically signi cant difference on knee joint position sense (assessed by isokinetic dynamometer) [17]. In another randomized controlled study conducted in healthy individuals; It has been reported that a single session of cervical manipulation is more effective in improving neck joint position sense compared to the control group [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been reported that by providing motor control with spinal manipulation, improvement in joint position sense can be achieved [39]. In a double-blind randomized controlled study in healthy individuals; a single session of pelvic manipulation did not provide a statistically signi cant difference on knee joint position sense (assessed by isokinetic dynamometer) [17]. In another randomized controlled study conducted in healthy individuals; It has been reported that a single session of cervical manipulation is more effective in improving neck joint position sense compared to the control group [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are studies in the literature on spinal stabilization or manipulation alone in healthy individuals [12][13][14][15][16][17]. However, there were no studies in which both were used together in healthy individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%