2018
DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0000000000001091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term Efficacy and Safety of a Latanoprost/Carteolol Fixed Combination Switched From Concomitant Therapy to in Patients With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Abstract: Purpose: We prospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of switching from concomitant latanoprost and carteolol hydrochloride (CH) to a latanoprost/carteolol fixed combination (LCFC) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Patients and Methods: A total of 43 patients (43 eyes) who were using latanoprost (once daily in the evening) and CH (once daily in the morning) concomitantly were switched to LCFC (once daily in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LC-FC has the same IOP lowering effect as the non-fixed combination of carteolol and latanoprost (LC-nFC) and LT-FC, and exerts a greater effect than carteolol and latanoprost monotherapy ( Yamamoto et al, 2016 ; Inoue et al, 2018 ; Inoue et al, 2020b ). In the study 1 of a two phase 3 clinical trial, 220 patients were treated with LC-FC (n = 113) or latanoprost (n = 116) for 8 weeks, while in the study 2, 175 patients were treated with LC-FC (n = 76), carteolol (n = 76), or LC-nFC (n = 37) for 8 weeks.…”
Section: Topical Fixed Combination Of Two Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…LC-FC has the same IOP lowering effect as the non-fixed combination of carteolol and latanoprost (LC-nFC) and LT-FC, and exerts a greater effect than carteolol and latanoprost monotherapy ( Yamamoto et al, 2016 ; Inoue et al, 2018 ; Inoue et al, 2020b ). In the study 1 of a two phase 3 clinical trial, 220 patients were treated with LC-FC (n = 113) or latanoprost (n = 116) for 8 weeks, while in the study 2, 175 patients were treated with LC-FC (n = 76), carteolol (n = 76), or LC-nFC (n = 37) for 8 weeks.…”
Section: Topical Fixed Combination Of Two Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adjusted mean IOP reduction in the study 1 was 2.9 and 1.6 mmHg in the LC-FC and latanoprost-treated patients, in the study two was 3.5, 3.5, and 1.6 mmHg in LC-FC, LC-nFC, and carteolol-treated patients ( Yamamoto et al, 2016 ). When patients with POAG or OHT were treated with LC-nFC and then switched to LC-FC, they showed an IOP of 15.0 ± 2.6, 15.1 ± 2.4, and 15.0 ± 2.4 mmHg at baseline, month 1 and 3, respectively ( Inoue et al, 2018 ). When patients with POAG, NTG, or OHT were treated with LT-FC and then switched to LC-FC, they showed a not significantly changed mean IOP after 1 month (15.9 ± 3.1 mmHg) and 3 months (16.3 ± 3.8 mmHg) compared to the baseline IOP with LT-FC (16.1 ± 3.1 mmHg) ( Inoue et al, 2020b ).…”
Section: Topical Fixed Combination Of Two Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have previously investigated the effects of a switch from latanoprost and carteolol therapy to an LCFC. 1 In that study, there was no significant difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) after switching and adherence was improved because of a decrease in the number of daily doses required; furthermore, many patients preferred treatment with an LCFC. In a Phase III clinical trial conducted in Japan, IOP was lowered effectively and safely in patients who were switched from latanoprost or carteolol monotherapy to LCFC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%