2010
DOI: 10.1080/01488376.2011.524513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Term Employment Services for Homeless Individuals: Perceptions from Stakeholders in a Community Partnership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, successful employment could buffer the harmful, circumstantial consequences of experiencing houselessness for certain individuals. Research suggests that employment prospects are critical for outcomes in many populations, such as recovery among people living with physical or mental illness (Radey and Wilkins, 2010). Job training and career development are essential for houseless employees.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, successful employment could buffer the harmful, circumstantial consequences of experiencing houselessness for certain individuals. Research suggests that employment prospects are critical for outcomes in many populations, such as recovery among people living with physical or mental illness (Radey and Wilkins, 2010). Job training and career development are essential for houseless employees.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…offering higher wages and more interesting work (20). Certain authors also emphasize that substance use should not be taken to imply diminished capacity, nor should abstinence be seen as a prerequisite to being able to engage with work (17,18,21,22). For example, (5) found that 16% of people who use psychoactive substances reported income from formal employment, even while living in situations of social precarity and maintaining their drug use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much is known about the pros and cons of specific shelter services, such as child care (Dashora et al, 2012 ), mental health counseling (Sleath et al, 2006 ), employment services (Radey & Wilkins, 2011 ), health care (Wenzel et al, 2001 ), drug and alcohol treatment (Slesnick & Erdem, 2013 ), and case management (Heslin et al, 2003a ). But the context in which these services exist, or the culture of the shelter, may be equally important for women's health and well‐being.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%