Short-Term Evaluation of Gustatory Changes After Surgical Removal of Mandibular Third Molar—A Prospective Randomized Control Trial

Shankar, D Prabhu; Manodh, Pedamally; Devadoss, P; Murugan, Aparna; Neelakandan, R. S.

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2017.06.028

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As parameters of textural properties of foods monitored by periodontal innervation contribute to taste perception, dental status should then be taken into account when discussing the impact of trigeminal sensations on taste perception. The literature review based on aqueous solution testing indicates that lower third molar removal has no effect on NaCl taste detection threshold but can affect basic taste recognition thresholds of up to 34% of patients in the short term . These findings contrast with a previous study based on 15‐ to 28‐years‐old subjects showing that taste intensity ratings for NaCl and citric acid were significantly reduced up to 6 months after maxillary and mandibular thirds molars removal .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 60%

“…No change on NaCl taste detection threshold was observed either one week or one month after single tooth (lower third molar) removal . Ten days after lower third molar removal, taste recognition thresholds were increased by 38.4% . Significant increase in lingual electrogustometric detection thresholds was also observed when more than 7 teeth were deafferented (removed or endodontically treated) .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 90%

“…After duplicates removal, abstract article record and backward searching yielded 169 articles. After full‐text record, a total of 111 articles remained for complete data extraction . Among them, we identified 23 studies as having a controlled protocol (including two studies with a randomisation process .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fifteen studies pertained to the effects of addition of capsaicin, menthol or CO2 on taste (Table ). Taste and dental deafferentation were assessed within 4 studies (Table ). The effects of chronic painful conditions such as idiopathic burning mouth syndrome (iBMS) and oral lichen planus were investigated within 9 studies (Table ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Intra‐oral trigeminal‐mediated sensations influencing taste perception: A systematic review

Boucher

2019

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In humans, food intake behaviour includes selecting, purchasing and cooking foods, organising meal patterns and actual ingestion. 1 Decisions concerning what, when and how much to eat may depend on physiological mechanisms (hunger and satiety), environmental influences, 2 social behaviour, 3,4 cognitive tasks, psychological attitudes and food sensory perception. Food perception is a multimodal sensation which implies cross-modal interplays, including aroma/ taste and texture/flavour interactions. 5During oral processing, food products are comminuted by the teeth and the tongue into small particle size, humidified and dissolved in saliva in order to form a swallowable food bolus. 3 Food's perceived flavour result from the simultaneous stimulation of three principal sensory processes: retronasal olfaction, taste and trigeminal sense. The sense of taste is closely related to food bolus formation and tastant dissolution by the combined action of saliva and mastication. Gustatory signals arise from tastant-mediated chemical stimulation of taste buds and are transduced by G-protein coupled receptors and ion channels constituting the molecular basis for basic tastes (ie sweet, bitter, salty, sour, umami and fatty acid taste). 6 Taste signals are then conveyed by the chorda tympani (CT), a branch of the facial nerve, the glossopharyngeal nerve (IX) and the vagus nerve (X) to the central nervous system. Taste, retronasal olfaction and oropharyngeal somatosensory modalities contribute to food flavour perception. Chemosensory impairments are frequently associated with reduced pleasure from eating 7 and can also cause unhealthy eating habits and unbalanced nutritional status. 8 Besides taste, oral somatosensory sensations related to food and oral conditions are generated during eating through Aβ, Aδ and C mechanosensory, chemosensory, thermosensory, proprioceptive and nociceptive trigeminal afferents innervating the mouth, oro-facial Abstract Food perception is a multimodal sensation which implies cross-modal interplays. Tactile, thermal, painful and kinaesthetic stimuli arising from food intake may impact on flavour perception, especially taste perception. The influence of oral somatosensory signals on food taste perception remains unclear. The aim of the present systematic review was to appraise the effects of oral mechanical, thermal, chemical and pain sensations on taste perception. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, a search of the literature from 1968 to 2018 was conducted using MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE and clinical trials (PROSPERO registration reference: CRD42018100176). A total of 105 articles were included for analysis. The results from this review suggest that taste abilities and taste perception are frequently modified by food textural and chemical properties. Furthermore, saliva features, dental and prosthetic status and oral pain can also modulate taste perception. Biological and physiological phenomena underlying these results may be ...

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 60%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 90%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Intra‐oral trigeminal‐mediated sensations influencing taste perception: A systematic review

Boucher

2019

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Four different titles were selected arbitrarily for this analysis. The Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (JOMS)45678910111213 was one journal title selected from journals indexed by Scopus and SCIE that was correctly classified as an oral surgery title. (Tables 1, 3) The Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (JKAOMS)14151617181920212223 was one journal title selected from the journals indexed by Scopus only and was correctly classified as an oral surgery title.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Classification of the journal category “oral surgery” in the Scopus and the Science Citation Index Expanded: flaws and suggestions

Kim

2019

JKAOMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the journal category “oral surgery” in Scopus and in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). Materials and Methods The Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (JOMS), The Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (JKAOMS), and The Journal of Prosthodontic Research (JPR) were selected from the Scopus list of journals as oral surgery journals. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (MPRS) was selected from PubMed as a Scopus oral surgery title. From these titles, 10 recently published articles were collected and used for reference analysis. Results The percentage of citations from oral surgery journals was 26.7%, 24.5%, and 40.1% for JKAOMS, MPRS, and JOMS, respectively. In total, 1.1% of JPR's citations were from oral surgery journals and significantly fewer from other journals ( P <0.001). The percentage of citations from dentistry journals excluding oral surgery journals was 11.9%, 34.4%, and 15.8% for JKAOMS, MPRS, and JOMS, respectively. For JPR, 80.6% of citations were from dentistry journals and significantly more were from other journals ( P <0.001). Conclusion Selected samples revealed that JPR is incorrectly classified as an oral surgery journal in Scopus. In addition, the scientific interaction among JKAOMS, MPRS, and JOMS was different to JPR in the reference analysis.

show abstract

Clinical investigation of gustatory and neurosensory alterations following mandibular third molar surgery: an observational prospective study

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Short-Term Evaluation of Gustatory Changes After Surgical Removal of Mandibular Third Molar—A Prospective Randomized Control Trial

Cited by 8 publications

References 37 publications

Intra‐oral trigeminal‐mediated sensations influencing taste perception: A systematic review

Intra‐oral trigeminal‐mediated sensations influencing taste perception: A systematic review

Classification of the journal category “oral surgery” in the Scopus and the Science Citation Index Expanded: flaws and suggestions

Clinical investigation of gustatory and neurosensory alterations following mandibular third molar surgery: an observational prospective study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About