2017
DOI: 10.2110/palo.2016.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-Term Evolution of Primary Sedimentary Surface Textures (Microbial, Abiotic, Ichnological) on a Dry Stream Bed: Modern Observations and Ancient Implications

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exposure surfaces are common and associated with this is the frosting of grains which would provide evidence for aeolian modification of exposed sands. Davies et al (2017) interpreted the surface in Fig. 5G as a shallow pond feature with ripples in the deepest part, a smooth pond margin and adhesion structures around the edges of the wet pond.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Exposure surfaces are common and associated with this is the frosting of grains which would provide evidence for aeolian modification of exposed sands. Davies et al (2017) interpreted the surface in Fig. 5G as a shallow pond feature with ripples in the deepest part, a smooth pond margin and adhesion structures around the edges of the wet pond.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davies et al . () interpreted the surface in Fig. G as a shallow pond feature with ripples in the deepest part, a smooth pond margin and adhesion structures around the edges of the wet pond.…”
Section: Lithofacies Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is particularly the case for bedding planes that we here distinguish with the term "true substrates": fossilized sediment-water (or sedimentair) interfaces that are the plan-view equivalents of chronostratigraphic surfaces in vertical profile (i.e., synoptic or sampled topography; Ganti et al, 2013;Paola et al, 2018). Not all true substrates can be recognized as such (Dott, 1983), but many can, particularly where they maintain an original morphology from the time of deposition (e.g., ripple marks) or host surficial ichnologic, biotic, sedimentary, petrographic, or pedogenic signatures (e.g., Miall and Arush, 2001;Davies et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preservation of skin textures within demonstrable surface traces shows that this stratigraphic surface can be considered to be a true substrate (Davies et al, 2017;: a sedimentary bedding plane which existed at the sediment-water or sedimentair interface at the time of deposition, and which was not degraded during the deposition of the overlying sands. The preservation of delicate footprint textures on a true substrate need not be unexpected, because the distal point source of the overlying crevasse splay sands means that their deposition at a specific footprint location was not necessarily coupled with erosion .…”
Section: Footprints At the Base Of The Lee Ness Sandstonementioning
confidence: 99%