2015 International Conference on Energy, Power and Environment: Towards Sustainable Growth (ICEPE) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/epetsg.2015.7510163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term hydrothermal scheduling using Time Varying Acceleration coefficient based Particle Swarm Optimization with Constriction Factor and Inertia Weight Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference [121] combined the PSO and differential evolution algorithm to solve the MOSTHTS problem while adopting the penalty factor approach to combine the two objectives into a single objective. Reference [122] solved CSTHTS problem while considering the valve point loading of thermal units by using PSO algorithm that updates the acceleration coefficients, inertia weight and constriction coefficients iteration to iteration. Reference [123] solved CSTHTS problem using modified dynamic neighbourhood learning-based PSO.…”
Section: B Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms Applied On Sthts Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reference [121] combined the PSO and differential evolution algorithm to solve the MOSTHTS problem while adopting the penalty factor approach to combine the two objectives into a single objective. Reference [122] solved CSTHTS problem while considering the valve point loading of thermal units by using PSO algorithm that updates the acceleration coefficients, inertia weight and constriction coefficients iteration to iteration. Reference [123] solved CSTHTS problem using modified dynamic neighbourhood learning-based PSO.…”
Section: B Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms Applied On Sthts Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 8 summarizes implementation of PSO and its variants for STHTS. [92], [94], [97], [105], [110], [112], [124], [128], [134] Near With different neighborhood topologies [92], [123], [130] Constriction factor PSO [113], [115], [117], [129] Hybrid of PSO and Evolutionary programming [95] Updating Inertia weights PSO [106] Quantum behaved PSO [98], [99], [127] Modified adaptive PSO [100] Self-organizing hierarchical PSO [101], [102] Time varying acceleration coefficients PSO [103], [122] Improved PSO [96], [104], [109] Efficient PSO [107] Mixed-binary evolutionary PSO [111] Dynamically controlled PSO [114], [125] Hybrid of PSO and DE [116], [121] Hybrid of PSO and direct search method [118] Enhanced PSO [120] Auxiliary search based PSO [131] Hybrid of PSO and GSA [132] Fully informed PSO [135] Accelerated PSO [136], [137] FIGURE 9. Year wise distribution of arti...…”
Section: B Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms Applied On Sthts Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%