2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term ingestion and tissue incorporation of Polystyrene microplastic in the scleractinian coral Porites porites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only the highest concentration (i.e., 2,500 particles L -1 ), which was chosen as a high pollution scenario, had detectable impacts on the physiology of the tested species and caused both negative (decreased photosynthetic efficiency) and positive (lower bleaching and mortality) effects. This is in line with previous studies showing that microplastics have only small effects when tested for common pollution scenarios (Berry et al, 2019;Grillo et al, 2021). Even though the rough surface and complex shape of coral colonies increase the chances to get in contact with microplastics in the environment (de Smit et al, 2021;Lim et al, 2020), at low environmental concentrations these coincidences are probably infrequent and largely stochastic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Only the highest concentration (i.e., 2,500 particles L -1 ), which was chosen as a high pollution scenario, had detectable impacts on the physiology of the tested species and caused both negative (decreased photosynthetic efficiency) and positive (lower bleaching and mortality) effects. This is in line with previous studies showing that microplastics have only small effects when tested for common pollution scenarios (Berry et al, 2019;Grillo et al, 2021). Even though the rough surface and complex shape of coral colonies increase the chances to get in contact with microplastics in the environment (de Smit et al, 2021;Lim et al, 2020), at low environmental concentrations these coincidences are probably infrequent and largely stochastic.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this fecal addition experiment, feces placed on coral fragments mimicked intact feces, yet in situ , fecal pellets sometimes fall apart in the water column ( 13 ), resulting in the release of silt to rice grain-sized particles. Such particle sizes may be less likely to cause smothering of coral polyps, and might be more readily removed or even taken up and digested by corals ( 73, 74 ); this should be experimentally tested. We did not examine whether coral fragments in this experiment consumed parts of fecal pellets; further, a lack of data on coprophagy behavior by Pocillopora spp., and corals in general, limits estimates of the likelihood and frequency with which corals may consume fish feces and associated microbiota.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…damicornis (50 mg/L (size 1 µm) for 12 h) [89]. Finally, short-term exposure to polystyrene particles did not significantly change the CAT activity and melanin content of Porites porites (1-1000 mg/L for 96 h) [90] and the chlorophyll concentration in symbionts of Poc. damicornis (50 mg/L (size 1 µm) for 24 h) [89], and medium-term exposure to microfibres and polystyrene (0.1 mg/L (size 0.05-1 cm and 500-1000 µm) for 12 days) did not change the respiration rate of Acropora sp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%