2020
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00990-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term outcomes of COVID-19 and risk factors for progression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the females received a larger dose/kg than males since the same bolus was delivered to all animals in spite of different weights (average weight of 1419 g for males and of 740 g for females at D0). A lower susceptibility has been suggested in females, at least in humans (23)(24)(25)(26), and this may explain why no difference in the severity of the disease was measurable between sexes in our study. Weight dependent infection doses in future studies may highlight sex differences in the severity of experimental outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In addition, the females received a larger dose/kg than males since the same bolus was delivered to all animals in spite of different weights (average weight of 1419 g for males and of 740 g for females at D0). A lower susceptibility has been suggested in females, at least in humans (23)(24)(25)(26), and this may explain why no difference in the severity of the disease was measurable between sexes in our study. Weight dependent infection doses in future studies may highlight sex differences in the severity of experimental outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…For COVID-19 patients, NLR has been shown to be an independent risk factor for severe disease [39][40][41]. Fifty (75.8%) patients with disease progression during hospitalization had a NLR !2.973 [42], which may indicate COVID-19 infection severity [43]. Binary logistic analysis identified elevated NLR (hazard risk (HR): 2.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.98-4.57) as an independent factor for poor COVID-19 clinical outcome [44], which was confirmed by a meta-analysis which reported that NLR values were significantly increased in severe COVID-19 patients [45].…”
Section: Hematologic Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Patients with LYM% <5% were critical, had a high mortality rate, and required intensive care. The NLR was higher for identifying patients with severe pneumonia, when compared to that for identifying those who have died, suggesting that a higher NLR might predict the progression during hospitalisation [25]. In the study conducted by Ding et al [26], the NLR was significantly higher in severe patients, when compared to non-severe patients, at all time points after hospital admission, and the NLR was positively correlated with hospitalisation time from day 5 after admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…All patients (n = 131) Survivors (n = 119, 90.2%) Non-survivors (n = 12, 9.8%) P-value a important contributor to respiratory viral infections [28], while cytokines, such as IL-10, IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor-α, might activate the neutrophils and damage the lymphocytes [25,29]. Thus, the NLR may reflect the level of severity of COVID-19.…”
Section: Demographic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%