a fictional yet realistic exemplar, is a 16-yearold Latinx girl hospitalized for bradycardia and hypotension attributable to malnutrition. Family-based treatment (FBT) for anorexia nervosa (AN) was recommended but not provided by her county, given an absence of trained clinicians. Instead, she received supportive individual therapy. Paloma required repeated hospitalizations over 18 months, each time requiring longer stays because of greater medical acuity. Her parents felt less and less empowered to manage her symptoms on discharge. After 6 hospitalizations, the county behavioral health plan agreed to contract with residential and partial-hospitalization programs. On discharge to outpatient care, she precipitously lost weight and was readmitted to the hospital. Paloma represents one of countless patients receiving Medicaid who are denied access to evidence-based care, with devastating consequences.The number of individuals requiring eating disorder treatment has increased dramatically since the onset of COVID-19, 1 with a increase of nearly 80% in calls to the National Eating Disorders Association helpline. 2 Eating disorders are severe but treatable psychiatric disorders that are underidentified and undertreated in youths from low-income families, with tragic consequences. Elevated suicide risk and serious medical consequences lead to 77 000 hospitalizations and emergency department visits and 10 000 deaths yearly, with annual costs of $65 billion in health care expenditures, informal care, and lost productivity and efficiency. 3 This Viewpoint focuses on AN and atypical AN (AAN) as eating disorders with more severe medical complications.Anorexia nervosa and AAN typically develop in adolescence or young adulthood and affect 4% of the US population. 4 Lay media and entertainment perpetuate the misperception that AN and AAN are conditions of White cisgender adolescent girls that somehow do not affect individuals from racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse groups, despite the fact that AN does not differ by race or ethnicity 5 and extreme dieting prevalence does not differ by socioeconomic status. 6 Nevertheless, screening for eating disorders in public mental health care systems is poor, with some systems deliberately minimizing or excluding screening questions from standardized assessments to absolve them of the legal obligation to provide treatment for a disorder in which their clinicians typically lack expertise. Screening is also low in primary care, schools, and other non-mental health sectors. Even when identified, eating disorders are undertreated. Although medical and behavioral health interventions for eating disorders in inpatient and outpatient settings are covered by Medicaid, terms of