2021
DOI: 10.1111/anec.12829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short‐term repeatability of the peguero‐lo presti electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy criteria

Abstract: Background: Electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (ECG-LVH) represents preclinical cardiovascular disease and predicts cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. While the newly developed Peguero-Lo Presti ECG-LVH criteria have greater sensitivity for LVH than the Cornell voltage and Sokolow-Lyon criteria, its short-term repeatability is unknown. Therefore, we characterized the short-term repeatability of Peguero-Lo Presti ECG-LVH criteria and evaluate its agreement with Cornell voltage and So… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this large study of more than 4,000 MESA participants with two consecutive routine Only few and mostly small previous studies assessed the reproducibility of ECG biomarkers. [34][35][36][37][38][39] The earlier small (n=253) GEH reproducibility study included primarily African Americans, performed only N median beat analysis, and demonstrated similar findings to the current study. [25] In two random 10-second ECG segments selected in 5-minute ECG recording, a heart rate differed by ~5 bpm, and spatial QRS-T angle differed by ~13 degrees.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In this large study of more than 4,000 MESA participants with two consecutive routine Only few and mostly small previous studies assessed the reproducibility of ECG biomarkers. [34][35][36][37][38][39] The earlier small (n=253) GEH reproducibility study included primarily African Americans, performed only N median beat analysis, and demonstrated similar findings to the current study. [25] In two random 10-second ECG segments selected in 5-minute ECG recording, a heart rate differed by ~5 bpm, and spatial QRS-T angle differed by ~13 degrees.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Only few and mostly small previous studies assessed the reproducibility of ECG biomarkers. [34][35][36][37][38][39] The earlier small (n=253) GEH reproducibility study included primarily African Americans, performed only N median beat analysis, and demonstrated similar findings to the current study. [25] In two random 10-second ECG segments selected in 5-minute ECG recording, a heart rate differed by ~5 bpm, and spatial QRS-T angle differed by ~13 degrees.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%