2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2017.8317886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-term travel time prediction by deep learning: A comparison of different LSTM-DNN models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 For this model also the output is not only dependent on the current input but on the output of previous hidden layers. Although a previous study, for instance, stacked LSTM and DNN for sequential data, 10 this study was able to implement this model, and also LSTM-DNN on non-sequential datasets. The following sections will go over a structure of LSTM model and a methodological approach taken in this study for setting hyperparameters.…”
Section: Lstmmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 For this model also the output is not only dependent on the current input but on the output of previous hidden layers. Although a previous study, for instance, stacked LSTM and DNN for sequential data, 10 this study was able to implement this model, and also LSTM-DNN on non-sequential datasets. The following sections will go over a structure of LSTM model and a methodological approach taken in this study for setting hyperparameters.…”
Section: Lstmmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Another study conducted to demonstrate the use of different LSTM and deep neural network (DNN) techniques to predict travel time on one or several time steps in the future. 10 Autoregressive integrated moving average, linear regression models and LSTM models with different setting, were conducted and compared. The results indicated that a stacked of LSTM along with deep neural layers (LSTM-DNN) outperform the other models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [19] used a hybrid LSTM model to predict the vehicle flow of each road section and intersection in an actual traffic network. They successfully used the maximum relative error to compare the difference between the actual and predictive vehicle flows.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LSTM networks are not affected by the exploding gradient problem that is common in regular RNN when trained to predict values at future steps. These characteristics have made LSTM networks popular for time-series forecasting ( Bao, Yue, & Rao, 2017;Bui, Le, & Cha, 2018;Liu, Wang, Yang, & Zhang, 2017 ). Most reported works in deep learning for time-series forecasting aim to predict the expected value rather than a prediction interval.…”
Section: Literature Review For Prediction Interval Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%