2016
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-016-0426-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short theta burst stimulation to left frontal cortex prior to encoding enhances subsequent recognition memory

Abstract: Deep semantic encoding of verbal stimuli can aid in later successful retrieval of those stimuli from long-term episodic memory. Evidence from numerous neuropsychological and neuroimaging experiments demonstrate regions in left prefrontal cortex, including left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), are important for processes related to encoding. Here, we investigated the relationship between left DLPFC activity during encoding and successful subsequent memory with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We were unable to replicate the previous study of iTBS demonstrating a significant increase in the accuracy of 2‐back task following iTBS compared to sham stimulation (Hoy et al, ). The reason for this discrepancy remains unclear, and further research is required as currently only a few studies have been performed in this area to date (Cheng et al, ; Debarnot et al, ; Demeter, Mirdamadi, Meehan, & Taylor, ; Hoy et al, ; Ryals, Rogers, Gross, Polnaszek, & Voss, ). A recent study investigated the effect of prefrontal TBS on a series of cognitive tasks, such as Digits Backward, 3‐back task, Stroop Colour and Word Test, and the Tower of Hanoi (Viejo‐Sobera et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were unable to replicate the previous study of iTBS demonstrating a significant increase in the accuracy of 2‐back task following iTBS compared to sham stimulation (Hoy et al, ). The reason for this discrepancy remains unclear, and further research is required as currently only a few studies have been performed in this area to date (Cheng et al, ; Debarnot et al, ; Demeter, Mirdamadi, Meehan, & Taylor, ; Hoy et al, ; Ryals, Rogers, Gross, Polnaszek, & Voss, ). A recent study investigated the effect of prefrontal TBS on a series of cognitive tasks, such as Digits Backward, 3‐back task, Stroop Colour and Word Test, and the Tower of Hanoi (Viejo‐Sobera et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be supported by the lack of practice effect reported in neurocognitive disorders 47 , 48 , which are characterized by deficits in memory consolidation and acquiring new information 49 . Considering that memory processes may be modified by TBS 50 , 51 , and theta frequency oscillations are associated with memory consolidation processes 12 , it might be possible that prefrontal stimulation affected the consolidation of task-related skills. Future studies assessing whether consolidation may also play a role in TBS-related WM performance changes, seem warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is contrary to a previous finding which demonstrated a significant increase in the accuracy of 2-back task following iTBS compared to sham stimulation (Hoy et al, 2015). The reason for this discrepancy remains unclear, and further research is required as currently only a few studies have been performed in this area to date (Cheng et al, 2016; Debarnot et al, 2015; Demeter et al, 2016; Hoy et al, 2015; Ryals et al, 2016). However, a similar lack of behavioural changes in the presence of robust neurophysiological effects after tDCS has also been described with a larger sample size (n = 20) (Hill et al, 2016), suggesting neurophysiological measures may provide a more sensitive index for assessing changes following neuromodulatory paradigms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%