Short‐time exposure to light at night affects incubation patterns and correlates with subsequent body weight in great tits (<i>Parus major</i>)

Diel rhythms are driven by genetic and environmental components. These rhythms are mediated by the circadian clock, and entail rhythmicity of various physiological and behavioural traits. Although individuals show to some extent repeatable timing (i.e., chronotype), there is ample variation of diel timing observed within and between individuals of the same species. Here, we investigated various environmental factors, including timing of the social partner, that could explain day-to-day variation within individuals. Synchronisation with the social partner during provisioning timing could increase breeding success, and decrease extrapair paternity opportunities for females during the fertile period in case of consistent timing across the breeding stages. Therefore, we also investigated fitness consequences of between-individual variation. We first assessed the magnitude of between- and within-individual variation in the timing of nest visits by great tits (Parus major). We monitored nest visits of males and females in 37 broods during chick provisioning in 2020 and 2021. Next, we explored the responsiveness of the diel timing to environmental variables, specifically comparing abiotic and social factors. The onset of nest visits varied significantly with day within the breeding season, rainfall and the diel timing of the breeding partner but not with night temperature. In response to the partner’s onset, females responded stronger compared to males. By contrast, offset was generally more variable within individuals and less variation was explained by the environmental variables. Both males and females delayed their activity offset with the progressing season and females also had a later onset with more daytime rainfall. Further, the reproductive output and extrapair paternity were independent of parental chronotype and their synchronisation within pairs. It is possible that consistency of chronotypes is less important for reproductive success than the ability to plastically respond to changing environmental conditions. Thus, the next step could be to investigate potential individual differences in plasticity which could be even linked to specific chronotypes. This information might be crucial to predict how species can cope with unpredictable environmental conditions.

show abstract

Circadian clock period length is not consistently linked to chronotype in a wild songbird

Tomotani,

Strauß,

Kishkinev

et al. 2024

Eur J of Neuroscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Circadian clock properties vary between individuals and relate to variation in entrained timing in captivity. How this variation translates into behavioural differences in natural settings, however, is poorly understood. Here, we tested in great tits whether variation in the free‐running period length (tau) under constant dim light (LL) was linked to the phase angle of the entrained rhythm (“chronotype”) in captivity and in the wild, as recently indicated in our study species. We also assessed links between tau and the timing of first activity onset and offset under LL relative to the last experienced light–dark (LD) cycle. We kept 66 great tits, caught in two winters, in LL for 14 days and subsequently released them with a radio transmitter back to the wild, where their activity and body temperature rhythms were tracked for 1 to 22 days. For a subset of birds, chronotype was also recorded in the lab before release. Neither wild nor lab chronotypes were related to tau. We also found no correlation between lab and wild chronotypes. However, the first onset in LL had a positive relationship with tau, but only in males. Our results demonstrate that links between tau and phase of entrainment, postulated on theoretical grounds, may not consistently hold under natural conditions, possibly due to strong masking. This calls for more holistic research on how the many components of the circadian system interact with the environment to shape timing in the wild.Wild birds showed chronotypes in the field that were unlinked to their circadian period length tau measured in captivity. In males only, the first onset of activity after exposure to constant dim light did correlate with tau. Our study emphasises the need to investigate clocks in the real world, including a need to better understand masking.

show abstract

Short‐time exposure to light at night affects incubation patterns and correlates with subsequent body weight in great tits (Parus major)

Cited by 3 publications

References 56 publications

Light pollution and its impacts on animal behavior

Light pollution and its impacts on animal behavior

Variation in diel timing in great tits is affected by the timing of their social mate

Circadian clock period length is not consistently linked to chronotype in a wild songbird

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About