2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2014.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-time quantum dynamics of sharp boundaries potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in the short-time regime, the effect of the potential term can be ignored in comparison to the kinetic one (for a detailed explanation, see Refs. [20,21] and references therein). Therefore, in the short time that follows the shutter's removal, the wavefunction singularity governs the wavefunction dynamics, and the non-linear electron-electron interaction can be neglected.…”
Section: Quantum Wire In 3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, in the short-time regime, the effect of the potential term can be ignored in comparison to the kinetic one (for a detailed explanation, see Refs. [20,21] and references therein). Therefore, in the short time that follows the shutter's removal, the wavefunction singularity governs the wavefunction dynamics, and the non-linear electron-electron interaction can be neglected.…”
Section: Quantum Wire In 3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the short-time regime, the effect of the potential term can be ignored in comparison to the kinetic one (for a detailed explanation, see Refs. [20,21] and references therein).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is clear that activation is suppressed when (50) which, in the slowly varying approximation (i.e., large τ), correspond to (see [40]) (51) Therefore, the incoming energies for which Ω act ≅ Ω, and thus no activation occurs, are approximately (see Figures 10 and 11) (52) Therefore, Eq. (42) should be rewritten more accurately as (53) like destructive interference condition in the WKB approximation (see, for example, ref.…”
Section: Selected Elevations and Forbidden Activationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate this point, we define the mean activated energy (40) where P(ω act Ω) is the probability of an incoming particle with energy Ω to exit the barrier with the energy ω act . In Figure 7 the mean activation energy <ω act > is plotted as a function of the perturbation time scale τ, and in Figure 8, <ω act > is plotted as a function of the incoming particle's energy Ω.…”
Section: Selected Elevations and Forbidden Activationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation