2022
DOI: 10.3390/sym14061231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short Time Series Forecasting: Recommended Methods and Techniques

Abstract: This paper tackles the problem of forecasting real-life crime. However, the recollected data only produced thirty-five short-sized crime time series for three urban areas. We present a comparative analysis of four simple and four machine-learning-based ensemble forecasting methods. Additionally, we propose five forecasting techniques that manage the seasonal component of the time series. Furthermore, we used the symmetric mean average percentage error and a Friedman test to compare the performance of the forec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kim et al [89] discussed the better forecasting performances for streamflow forecasting in the high flow (higher autocorrelation coefficients) regime than those in the low flow regime. The data with no autocorrelation, deemed as white noise, is difficult to forecast [90].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al [89] discussed the better forecasting performances for streamflow forecasting in the high flow (higher autocorrelation coefficients) regime than those in the low flow regime. The data with no autocorrelation, deemed as white noise, is difficult to forecast [90].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likewise appreciated that well-established non-network time-series methods, while useful for classification 21 or feature-extraction 22 24 , and potentially useful for pre-conditioning operations for the method of this report, do not generate data from which low-variance measures of short-term dynamics can be directly read. Additionally, while these methods lie on a spectrum with regard to the requisite degree of prior knowledge of the processes governing system dynamics (e.g., low for wavelets 21 , 22 , high for Kalman filtering and related methods 25 , 26 ), mathematically they are more strongly assumption-dependent or model-based than the fr-OPN method used here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, to perform an ITSA, we use the intervention year detected as a level shift in the model to segment our data into pre- and post-intervention phases. Following previously published studies for accurately forecasting small-sized time-series, 12 , 13 we then employed ARIMA and ForecastHybrid models 12 , 13 to predict the scenario without Xpert adoption (counterfactual scenario) from data collected prior to its implementation and compared their accuracy measures with Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). Afterwards, the most accurate predictions of the hypothetical (counterfactual) scenarios were then compared to the real (observed) values post-intervention to assess the impact of Xpert implementation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%