2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-006-0557-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shortcomings in methodology complicate measurements of serum retinol binding protein (RBP4) in insulin-resistant human subjects

Abstract: Aims/hypothesis Levels of retinol binding protein (RBP4) are increased in the serum of insulin-resistant human subjects even before overt diabetes develops. RBP4 levels correlate with insulin resistance, BMI, WHR, dyslipidaemia and hypertension. Improvement of insulin sensitivity with exercise training is associated with reduction in serum RBP4 levels. Therefore serum RBP4 may be useful for early diagnosis of insulin resistance and for monitoring improvements in insulin sensitivity. We sought to determine the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
152
4
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
15
152
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we used this method to validate the results obtained by sandwich ELISA in our patients and control subjects. Consistent with the previous data [8], serum RBP4 levels detected by western blot were significantly higher than the concentrations obtained by ELISA in all patient groups (Fig. 1b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, we used this method to validate the results obtained by sandwich ELISA in our patients and control subjects. Consistent with the previous data [8], serum RBP4 levels detected by western blot were significantly higher than the concentrations obtained by ELISA in all patient groups (Fig. 1b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Yet we found close correlations between the two techniques in all patient subgroups studied. Interestingly, in accordance with the previous data [8], RBP4 levels detected by immunoblot were significantly higher than in ELISA (Fig. 1b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations