2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shortest path distance vs. least directional change: Empirical testing of space syntax and geographic theories concerning pedestrian route choice behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
3
57
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, as discussed above, we deem route choice models purely based on cost minimisation partial and not able to account for the complexity and variability of human spatial behaviour, people do make use of metric information [99,100] and, successfully or not, may attempt to minimise distance or change of direction [101]. Hence, to assess the plausibility of the routes generated within the four scenarios, we computed for each route the deviation from the corresponding road distance shortest path (SP) as:…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, as discussed above, we deem route choice models purely based on cost minimisation partial and not able to account for the complexity and variability of human spatial behaviour, people do make use of metric information [99,100] and, successfully or not, may attempt to minimise distance or change of direction [101]. Hence, to assess the plausibility of the routes generated within the four scenarios, we computed for each route the deviation from the corresponding road distance shortest path (SP) as:…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase of the walking distance is a potential reason of pedestrians not using footbridges (Räsänen et al 2007). Most pedestrians tend to choose the shortest path route between an origin and a destination (Shatu et al 2019).…”
Section: Disadvantages Of Footbridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Theodoridou, Varouchakis, and Karatzas () compare kriging predictions of ground water levels using different spatial correlation functions and Euclidean, Manhattan, Minkowski, Canberra, and Bray‐Curtis distance metrics and found that Manhattan distance performed the best. Recently, work has been done to account for barriers that naturally occur in environmental distances, for example, driving distances that must follow roadways (Z. Hong, Chen, & Mahmassani, ; Shatu, Yigitcanlar, & Bunker, ) or pollutants that follow wind patterns (Li, Gong, & Zhou, ). This type of distance measure is often called path distance.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%