2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.100.196802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shot Noise in Ballistic Graphene

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

34
254
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(290 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
34
254
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that our model for metallic leads is similar to the corresponding model in graphene [8] which has already been success-fully applied to the interpretation of ballistic transport in graphene nanostructures, see, for instance, the shot noise measurement in Ref. [9]. It differs however from the model introduced in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…We note that our model for metallic leads is similar to the corresponding model in graphene [8] which has already been success-fully applied to the interpretation of ballistic transport in graphene nanostructures, see, for instance, the shot noise measurement in Ref. [9]. It differs however from the model introduced in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…5(a) at low bias. 4 This heating effect will become less important at large bias because the shot noise will eventually take over fully and, thus, the value of F saturates. Other mechanisms that can change the measured Fano factor include electron-electron interactions [24,5], incoherent scattering [9], and thermal gradients in the metallic lead due to heat diffusion [25].…”
Section: Results On Shot Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eq. (9)) to extract the average Fano factor F [17,18,4], which yields F = 0.338 at the Dirac point (at V bias = 40 mV).…”
Section: Results On Shot Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations