2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shot peening of TRIP780 steel: Experimental analysis and numerical simulation

Abstract: is an open access repository that collects the work of Arts et Métiers ParisTech researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. This is an author-deposited version published in: https://sam.ensam.eu Handle ID ABSTRACTThis study aims at the experimental and numerical analysis of TRIP780 steel after conventional shot peening. TRIP steels exhibit a multiphase microstructure with martensitic transformation of the retained austenite during shot peening. In-depth experimental analysis are car… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The first step in the current investigation was to prove the validity of the proposed finite element shot-peening model. This was carried out by comparing the predicted residual stress profiles (𝜎 11 − 𝜎 33 ) in one direction (X in-plane direction according to Figure 3 (c)) within TRIP780 steel to its corresponding experimental profiles [39] obtained by XRD technique and under similar shot-peening (SP) conditions: (1) D= 0.4 (mm), V= 60×10 3 (mm/s), C= 230 (%), α= 90 (c) (°) and ( 2) D= 0.6 (mm), V= 60×10 3 (mm/s), C= 270 (%), α= 90 (°). All the presented FE results were extracted using a post-processing script based on taking the average at nodes, at each depth with respect to the undeformed mesh, situated in an hexagonal zone corresponding to the 4 th range of the target component (hexagon of radius of 3×e) as depicted in Figure 4.…”
Section: Validation Of the Shot-peening Model For Trip780 Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first step in the current investigation was to prove the validity of the proposed finite element shot-peening model. This was carried out by comparing the predicted residual stress profiles (𝜎 11 − 𝜎 33 ) in one direction (X in-plane direction according to Figure 3 (c)) within TRIP780 steel to its corresponding experimental profiles [39] obtained by XRD technique and under similar shot-peening (SP) conditions: (1) D= 0.4 (mm), V= 60×10 3 (mm/s), C= 230 (%), α= 90 (c) (°) and ( 2) D= 0.6 (mm), V= 60×10 3 (mm/s), C= 270 (%), α= 90 (°). All the presented FE results were extracted using a post-processing script based on taking the average at nodes, at each depth with respect to the undeformed mesh, situated in an hexagonal zone corresponding to the 4 th range of the target component (hexagon of radius of 3×e) as depicted in Figure 4.…”
Section: Validation Of the Shot-peening Model For Trip780 Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning TRIP steels treated by shot-peening, only few studies have investigated the effect of shot-peening including phase transformation in different steel grades. Experimental studies analysed the residual stresses in the different phases such as austenite, ferrite if present, and created martensite, along with their evolving volume fractions [35] [36] [37] [38] [39]. For the modeling of shot-peening with phase transformation, Halilovič et al [40] developed a finite element model for laser shock peening on AISI 304 steel by using a material model developed by [34] and implemented in ABAQUS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information about the velocity of particles and their impact rate on a structure were useful to have predictive information about the initial conditions to apply to a multiimpact Finite Element model such as developed by [37], [38] or [39]. 3D measurements using two synchronized high-speed cameras or by using a mirror from another point of view, would be a perspective to obtain the complete velocity field and to focus on the particles close to the centerline compared to the ones at the edges of the stream.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Більшість із них присвячено дослідженню зношуванню поверхонь при терті, наприклад [1,[4][5][6], а також обробці при ударі [7][8][9][10][11] для досягнення регулярних поверхневих мікроструктур [12]. На жаль, результати дослідження, отримані на використанні аналітичної моделі взаємодії окремої дробинки з пружно-пластичним півпростором [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], зокрема й чисельним моделюванням [22][23][24][25] проведені без глибокого узагальнення на технологічні параметри дії дробоструминного факела. Окрім цього, варто відмітити, що деякі параметри складного процесу дробоструміння взагалі неможливо отримати аналітично, а тільки експериментально.…”
Section: вступunclassified