1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1993.tb00224.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should a Brain‐dead Pregnant Woman Carry Her Child to Full Term? The Case of the “Erlanger Baby”

Abstract: In October 1992 a young woman died in a car accident. She was pregnant and her fetus appeared to be unhurt, so a decision had to be made: should the mother's body be artificially supported in order to give the fetus a chance to live? The situation became a public question that split the nation in two. One side demanded -- that the young woman -- and her child -- be left to die in dignity. The other side referred to the unborn child's right to live and therefore wanted the body of the woman maintained until the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The prolongation of corporeal support could be misunderstood by the public as using a cadaver as an incubator, but this line of thinking could be seen to underestimate the mother's invested months of pregnancy, and that continuation would also mean biologic continuity of her life and symbolic continuity of her being . As a result of this misinterpretation, on some occasions these cases have encountered public outrage, whereby the public has been divided among those disgusted with using the deceased mother's body (cadaver) for the interests of the fetus, and those that have defended the fetal right to life; for example, the Erlanger Baby case . Those that are against such praxis argue that it awakes among the public outdated stereotypes of pregnancy as an “architect and bee model”, or that continuation with such a procedure destroys the woman's bodily integrity, desacralizing her body, and preventing her from dying with dignity .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prolongation of corporeal support could be misunderstood by the public as using a cadaver as an incubator, but this line of thinking could be seen to underestimate the mother's invested months of pregnancy, and that continuation would also mean biologic continuity of her life and symbolic continuity of her being . As a result of this misinterpretation, on some occasions these cases have encountered public outrage, whereby the public has been divided among those disgusted with using the deceased mother's body (cadaver) for the interests of the fetus, and those that have defended the fetal right to life; for example, the Erlanger Baby case . Those that are against such praxis argue that it awakes among the public outdated stereotypes of pregnancy as an “architect and bee model”, or that continuation with such a procedure destroys the woman's bodily integrity, desacralizing her body, and preventing her from dying with dignity .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different arguments have arisen in the literature, even to the extent of a woman who was brain dead being misrepresented as still alive, supporting this with inconsistent language and terminology . Thinking along these lines, some confusion exists in the literature between the rights of a woman who is alive and one who is dead, mainly presented as a conflict of rights between the fetus's right to life and the rights of the woman who is brain dead, in connection with the woman's right to abortion .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient's family should be involved in all decisions and be aware of the responsibility for possible care of a child [10,11]. The situation in question is exceptionally complex and can provoke extremely different emotions and opinions, not only of the relatives but also of society [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these issues are not relevant as the patient is already dead. [13] Some professionals suggest that if the mother had a previous inclination to donate her organs, extended somatic support is justifiable to preserve the organs. Others argue that such support is still in the experimental stage with suboptimal knowledge about the adverse effects of the medications on the fetus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%