“…83 The court was, however, unwilling to assume sole responsibility for designing a system of candidate disclosure: "where there is inaction by the executive, for whatever reason, the judiciary must step in, in exercise of its constitutional obligations to provide a solution"-but just until the legislature enacts "proper legislation to cover the field." 84 It forced action while drawing on the proposals of others and leaving room for supplanting legislation. India may have a weak record of protecting controversial private speech, 85 but its courts found a way to encourage a measure of official openness.…”