2016
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should e-cigarette use be permitted in smoke-free public places? No

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advocates for allowing vaping in public places say that vaping emissions do not harm bystanders, but evidence is insuffi cient to support this claim. 62 One study showed that passive exposure to e-cigarette aerosol generated increases in serum levels of cotinine (a nicotine metabolite) similar to those with passive exposure to conventional cigarette smoke. 5 Accidental nicotine poisoning in children as a result of ingesting e-cigarette liquid is also a major concern, 63 particularly with sweet fl avors such as bubblegum or cheesecake that may be attractive to children.…”
Section: ■ Secondhand Vape and Other Exposure Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advocates for allowing vaping in public places say that vaping emissions do not harm bystanders, but evidence is insuffi cient to support this claim. 62 One study showed that passive exposure to e-cigarette aerosol generated increases in serum levels of cotinine (a nicotine metabolite) similar to those with passive exposure to conventional cigarette smoke. 5 Accidental nicotine poisoning in children as a result of ingesting e-cigarette liquid is also a major concern, 63 particularly with sweet fl avors such as bubblegum or cheesecake that may be attractive to children.…”
Section: ■ Secondhand Vape and Other Exposure Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papers led by Chapman1 and Bauld2 illustrate the wide divide that exists among opponents and proponents of such use. The perspectives of smokers and ex-smokers in the UK, to date the most liberal in embracing the potential of e-cigarettes to reduce cigarette smoking, are captured in a paper by Brose et al 3 who find mixed results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National governments remain responsible for other areas of e-cigarette policy without cross border effects including minimum purchase ages for e-cigarettes and rules relating to their use in public places. Public Health England have played a prominent role in discussions about the regulation of e-cigarettes (Bauld et al 2014;Dockrell et al 2013;McNeill et al 2015a), including the issue of public use which, following the implementation of the TPD has emerged as a key point of contention between actors (Chapman et al 2017;Bauld et al 2016).…”
Section: E-cigarette Regulation In the Ukmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of e-cigarettes, this process was complicated by the limited evidence base on the health effects of e-cigarettes in real world conditions or their patterns of use and the significant divisions which have emerged within the tobacco control and public health communities regarding e-cigarettes (cf. Etter 2013; Chapman 2013; Chapman et al 2017;McNeill et al 2015a;McKee and Capewell 2015a). Those in favour on e-cigarettes emphasise their potential usefulness as smoking cessations tools, and emphasise that e-cigarettes offer a market oriented and demand led solution to smoking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%