2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10614-010-9204-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should Economists Use Open Source Software for Doing Research?

Abstract: Open source, Econometric software, Gretl, Accuracy, Software reliability,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To highlight how depositing code and data, even if well documented, is not sufficient, consider the point raised by Yalta and Yalta (2012). They run accuracy tests on various econometrics software, looking at different versions of the same software.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To highlight how depositing code and data, even if well documented, is not sufficient, consider the point raised by Yalta and Yalta (2012). They run accuracy tests on various econometrics software, looking at different versions of the same software.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of the workbench and the underlying spatial econometric code as open source allows us to tap into powerful community peer review resources. Yalta and Yalta (2010) provide a number of impressive examples where open source processes have resulted in superior results relative to the proprietary model regarding the detection and correction of numerical inaccuracies in mainstream econometric software. This type of engagement blurs the distinction between researcher as consumer of scientific software to researcher as a collaborative producer with the end benefit of enhanced knowledge production and higher quality tool evolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important point to ascertain is the validity of the instruments. To ensure that the instruments used were still valid (Yalta and Yalta, 2012)…”
Section: Systematic Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%