2004
DOI: 10.1108/10222529200400020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should employee share options be expensed in an entity’s financial statements?

Abstract: This paper investigates the debate as to whether employee share options (ESOs) should be expensed in an entity's financial statements as required by the IASB's IFRS 2 -Share-based payment (2004). The paper presents arguments for and against expensing ESOs, demonstrating that compensation of employees via ESOs is a bona fide expense in terms of the recognition and measurement criteria of the IASB Framework. It concludes that, the substance of an ESO transaction is that the entity pays an employee for his servic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sacho and Oberholster (2005) argued that exercise date accounting for outstanding employee share options should be applied. Sacho and Wingard (2004) concluded that employee share options should be expensed, a norm that was subsequently applied by the standard‐setters. Steyn and Hamman (2003) proposed certain amendments to the cash flow statement.…”
Section: Classification Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sacho and Oberholster (2005) argued that exercise date accounting for outstanding employee share options should be applied. Sacho and Wingard (2004) concluded that employee share options should be expensed, a norm that was subsequently applied by the standard‐setters. Steyn and Hamman (2003) proposed certain amendments to the cash flow statement.…”
Section: Classification Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%