2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1435-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should European Independent Ethics Committees be dismantled?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be eligible for such “fast-track” review, protocols must entail only “minimal risks” to participants. In an editorial to these two papers, Chassany [99] reminds us that the EU directive and all provisions it sets up cover only the area of drug research, and that the rest of clinical research, on medical devices, surgery, pathophysiology, etc., is totally left out. This is a major cause for the heterogeneity of ethical review within the EU.…”
Section: Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be eligible for such “fast-track” review, protocols must entail only “minimal risks” to participants. In an editorial to these two papers, Chassany [99] reminds us that the EU directive and all provisions it sets up cover only the area of drug research, and that the rest of clinical research, on medical devices, surgery, pathophysiology, etc., is totally left out. This is a major cause for the heterogeneity of ethical review within the EU.…”
Section: Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%