Should gender be a determinant factor for granting crowdfunded microloans?

Abstract

Crowdfunded microloans are a suitable tool for financing basic economic activities in developing as well as developed countries, favouring female empowerment. Despite the loans being relatively small, the widespread use of this instrument merits analyzing the factors affecting the microloan. One of these factors is gender because microloans are an important tool to finance projects promoted by women in many developing countries where microfinance is widely diffused. This research aims to determine if the gender of crowdfunded micro-borrowers is related to the main features which define the conditions of a microloan: amount, term, number of lenders, length of time to contact with borrowers and repayment system. The methodology used is the multinomial logit regression. The sample used in this study has been obtained by applying sampling techniques to a extensive public database from Kiva. This provided information on microloans from 56 countries around the world. The results based on amount, term, repayment method and recruitment period indicate that women are the best borrowers. All these variables, except the term, are significant at a 5% level. These findings may be useful to improve financial inclusion and outreach, consistently with the Sustainable Development Goals. Future research is needed to assess how “green and pink” microfinance (with environmental strategies particularly favored by women) can attract more ESG-compliant crowdfunding resources.

Factors Affecting Micro and Small Enterprises’ Access to Microfinance in Croatia

“…Although, some scholars consider that gender is a predictor of financial leverage, while others conclude the opposite (Cole and Mehran, 2018). Hence micro loans are recognized as a valuable tool for women's empowerment in both developed and developing countries (Cruz Rambaud et al, 2022) it is important to investigate whether female entrepreneurs use micro loan more than their male counterparts. Thus based on previous literature, it is hypothesized: H1: There is a difference in access to microfinance considering gender, education level of entrepreneurs and financial literacy of entrepreneurs.…”

Randomized evaluation of a school-based, trauma-informed group intervention for young women in Chicago

“…Existing data also suggest that investing in programming for young women may provide benefits beyond the individuals served. For example, research suggests that programs that help males tend to primarily benefit participating individuals, whereas programs that help females yield greater benefits for families and communities ( 11 ).…”

A comprehensive framework for understanding microfinance performance evaluation methods

“…In this context, microfinance is used today in a multitude of areas with very different objectives, yet consistently serves as a tool to drive positive social transformation. Its utilization spans initiatives concerning gender equality (Cruz Rambaud et al, 2022;Bapolisi et al, 2024), minority integration (Cruz Rambaud et al, 2022), digitization (Johri et al, 2024), mobile banking (Osabohien et al, 2024), youth empowerment (Rokhim et al, 2023), or entrepreneurship promotion (Coronel-Pangol et al, 2023), among other related issues.…”