2012
DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2012.1220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should High-Dose Interleukin-2 Still Be the Preferred Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma?

Abstract: For more than 20 years interleukin-2 (IL2) was the preferred treatment for medically fit metastatic melanoma patients, but recently two new agents, ipilimumab and vemurafenib, were approved for stage IV disease. Single-institution data were used to determine the long-term survival rate for IL2-treated melanoma patients, and whether use of inpatient IL2 had declined recently. Between May 1987 and April 2010, 150 patients were hospitalized for high-dose, intravenous (i.v.) IL2. The average number of IL2 patients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 20% 5-year survival rates from date of IL2 therapy in these studies suggested a benefit for a number of patients who had not obtained an objective response. 14,24 What is provocative about the current retrospective review is that patients, who received IL2 + ASI in the form of a TC or DC/TC vaccine, had a 5-year survival rate that was three times higher than patients who received only IL2, but the latter's 5-year survival rate of 13% is similar to the survival rate reported by various investigators for high-dose IL2 therapy. 15,[24][25][26] IL2 has been used as a standard therapy to treat melanoma ever since its regulatory approval for the treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer in 1992.…”
Section: Il2 Plus Active Specific Immunotherapy 55mentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 20% 5-year survival rates from date of IL2 therapy in these studies suggested a benefit for a number of patients who had not obtained an objective response. 14,24 What is provocative about the current retrospective review is that patients, who received IL2 + ASI in the form of a TC or DC/TC vaccine, had a 5-year survival rate that was three times higher than patients who received only IL2, but the latter's 5-year survival rate of 13% is similar to the survival rate reported by various investigators for high-dose IL2 therapy. 15,[24][25][26] IL2 has been used as a standard therapy to treat melanoma ever since its regulatory approval for the treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer in 1992.…”
Section: Il2 Plus Active Specific Immunotherapy 55mentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Before availability of these agents, high-dose inpatient interleukin-2 (IL2) regimens were considered the treatment of choice in those patients who were physically fit enough for such therapy. 12,13 We documented a dramatic decline in the use of IL2 in the treatment of metastatic melanoma in recent years, 14 but also suggested that IL2 should still be the treatment of choice in patients who are medically fit enough for such treatment. This suggestion was based on the documentation of a surprisingly high 20% 5-year survival rate for 150 patients treated with inpatient IL2 regimens during 1987-2010, and the lack of long-term follow-up data for the newer therapies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in patients with metastatic melanoma, long term survival remains at less than 10% [2]. Traditional regimens including dacarbazine, temozolomide, high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2), and paclitaxel with or without cisplatin or carboplatin have demonstrated only modest response rates (<20%) [3]. More recently, novel immunotherapeutic and targeted approaches have been developed and used in the treatment of metastatic melanoma, including ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against CTLA-4, and vemurafenib, a specific inhibitor of signaling by mutated BRAF [3], but both agents possess unique limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional regimens including dacarbazine, temozolomide, high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2), and paclitaxel with or without cisplatin or carboplatin have demonstrated only modest response rates (<20%) [3]. More recently, novel immunotherapeutic and targeted approaches have been developed and used in the treatment of metastatic melanoma, including ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against CTLA-4, and vemurafenib, a specific inhibitor of signaling by mutated BRAF [3], but both agents possess unique limitations. Phase III trials with ipilimumab showed an overall response rate of less than 20% and revealed a serious potential for autoimmune toxicity, with immune-related events occurring in 60% of patients [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A smaller subset of patients respond to immunotherapy, such as systemic interleukin-2 (IL-2) therapy, interferon (IFN)- α or immune-modulating antibodies such as anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) and anti-PD1(L). In contrast to targeted therapy, ∼70% of complete responders to IL-2 treatment display long-term regression and, in many cases, can be considered cured, emphasising the role of IL-2 and immunotherapy in melanoma treatment (Smith et al , 2008; Hodi et al , 2010; Coventry and Ashdown, 2012; Dillman et al , 2012; Simeone and Ascierto, 2012; Lipson et al , 2013). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%