2017
DOI: 10.1525/dcqr.2017.6.4.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should I Share My Journal Entry With You? A Critical Exploration of Relational Ethics in Autoethnography

Abstract: Journal entries documenting hidden emotions about my dual role as law teacher and practicing lawyer provide powerful insight into an aspect of academic practice not yet considered by autoethnography. But my stories are a consequence of my interactions with students. How do I negotiate the desire to give voice to a hidden world, yet protect the bonds of trust? This essay critically explores relational ethics in autoethnography from the unique perspective of a law clinic supervisor. Drawing on lessons from memoi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethical issues can be seen in multiple pairings, such as friendships (Connolly, 2012), researchers-study participants (Jackson, 2021), caregivers-patients (Marquis, 2002), employersemployees (Kim & Kim, 2020), and therapists-clients (Gergen, 2015). Some colleagues have addressed instructor-student interactions and noted some ambiguities about the interactional dynamics (Allen, 1995;Campbell, 2017).…”
Section: Relational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ethical issues can be seen in multiple pairings, such as friendships (Connolly, 2012), researchers-study participants (Jackson, 2021), caregivers-patients (Marquis, 2002), employersemployees (Kim & Kim, 2020), and therapists-clients (Gergen, 2015). Some colleagues have addressed instructor-student interactions and noted some ambiguities about the interactional dynamics (Allen, 1995;Campbell, 2017).…”
Section: Relational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%