2006
DOI: 10.2190/p306-5q20-5v8k-m615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should Incurable Patients Be Allowed to Die?

Abstract: We examined differences in attitudes to the question "Should incurable patients be allowed to die?" using the General Social Survey cumulative data from 1972-2002. Utilizing logistic regression, we examined support for this statement with age, gender, race and other background variables in the basic model. Our findings are in line with past work that finds younger people, men and self-defined liberals support non-treatment compared to others all else equal. Controlling for background variables; however, we fou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it is now commonplace to use the expression ‘the right to die’ – as if one had any choice about the matter! In a recent example of this, Babylon and Monk-Turner (2006) posed the question ‘Should incurable patients be allowed to die?’ The image is almost reminiscent of King Canute – a stern-faced, single-minded committee opposing the incoming tide of death.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it is now commonplace to use the expression ‘the right to die’ – as if one had any choice about the matter! In a recent example of this, Babylon and Monk-Turner (2006) posed the question ‘Should incurable patients be allowed to die?’ The image is almost reminiscent of King Canute – a stern-faced, single-minded committee opposing the incoming tide of death.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%