2017
DOI: 10.18520/cs/v112/i04/703-713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should Indian Researchers Pay to Get their Work Published?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have aimed to calculate APC expenditure at country, funder, disciplinary or publisher level. In India, Madhan et al (2017) estimated that, between 2010 and 2014, researchers spent around US $2.4 million annually on APCs to publish about 15,400 papers in gold OA journals (i.e., excluding hybrid OA), with prices ranging from US $7.5 to US $5000. White et al (2021) studied journal articles published by researchers at all eight New Zealand universities in 2017.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Apcs Price Models Fees Charged and Expense Mon...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have aimed to calculate APC expenditure at country, funder, disciplinary or publisher level. In India, Madhan et al (2017) estimated that, between 2010 and 2014, researchers spent around US $2.4 million annually on APCs to publish about 15,400 papers in gold OA journals (i.e., excluding hybrid OA), with prices ranging from US $7.5 to US $5000. White et al (2021) studied journal articles published by researchers at all eight New Zealand universities in 2017.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Apcs Price Models Fees Charged and Expense Mon...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are voices from the global south against the APC‐based model (Babini & Machin‐Mastromatteo, 2015). APC‐based OA publishing model creates an additional financial burden on the funders (Madhan et al, 2017). In general, replacing the subscription model with paid OA options will automatically increase the financial burden on funding agencies and inequity in the system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The open access system of research publications needs to be stopped. As also argued recently by Madhan et al (2017), the funding agencies should not pay for publication charges since doing that would negate possible support to many other researchers in the research-funds-starved situation that we face. Instead, we need to encourage institutional and national repositories where soft copies of research publications are maintained and made available to all interested readers without any charge.…”
Section: Subhash C Lakhotiamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since authors find it difficult to pay the hefty charges demanded and dictated by the publication houses, an arrangement has been arrived at so that the funding agency meets the costs of publication of results coming out of its research funding. Madhan et al (2017) have recently estimated that India is potentially spending about US$ 2.4 million per year on open access journals and that the amount would be much more if the article processing charges paid to make papers published in hybrid open access journals are also taken into account. This obviously means that substantial amounts that could have been available to support more research, actually end in the coffers of publication houses.…”
Section: Subhash C Lakhotiamentioning
confidence: 99%