Fortune is a woman, and it is necessary if you wish to master her, to conquer her by force -MachiavelliForward, by Professor. Kimberly R. Carter: This important paper is a reminder of the "troubled engagement" ignited in the widely-read International Studies Quarterly (1997-98) conversation between J. Ann Tickner and Robert Keohane. In many ways, the last fifteen or so years have seen realists and feminists engage in their own scholarly Cold War -you go your way, and I'll go mine as we "just don't understand" one another's worldview. To continue with this analogy, Al-Kassimi's paper is an effort at rapprochement. Not only do we understand one another, but feminists are keen to dive off the sidelines of IR scholarship and swim into the mainstream; at times, the best way is to frame important gendered security issues in ways that are appealing to those audiences who remain at the disciplinary centre. As our world continues to change at rapid pace, I, for one, look forward to a new chapter in IR driven less by theoretical dogma and more by young scholars making important connections between theories in order to help us explain and understand the most relevant security threats of the twenty-first century.
AbstractAs the tittle proposes the aim of this paper is to understand the position of women in International Relations (IR) by utilizing feminism as an approach and the individual as the referent object of security. The essay is divided in 3 sections consecutively. The first section deals with the "why" and "where"; why women are marginalized in IR, this section touches upon epistemology and western philosophy that in turn allows us to locate the position of women in IR. The second section demands that rape is recognized as a weapon of war because it represents a threat to national security even by assessing it using a realist approach to IR with the state as a security referent object. Lastly, the third section discusses how realism took centre-stage as an approach after the catalyst event of 9/11 which resulted in some optimism and pessimism by feminists because the administration adopted its own kind of feminist rhetoric. Referent object, Hegemonic masculinity, Rape, Feminism, Individual, State, 9/11 The aim of this article is to shed light on reasons as to why women are marginalized in the field of International Relations, which subsequently answers the question as to where are women in international relations. To answer such question, I will approach International relations from its sub-approach, that is, International Security Studies (ISS) or more specifically Feminist Security Studies. The reason for such selection of approach is because feminists or women in general face gender-specific security problems which are overlooked because of the nature of IR which is a men dominated, hyper-masculine field and precisely because IR and its traditionalist realist approach hold the state as the main referent object of security. The first section will discuss that because the post-cold war era lacked a catalyst ...